THE COLLEGE RACKET

This bubble needs to burst

Linda Chavez NY Post January 19, 2012

When President Obama gives his state of the union address next week, you can count on his making a big pitch for education. In last year’s speech, he said, “Cutting the deficit by gutting our investments in innovation and education is like lightening an overloaded airplane by removing its engine.”

But dumping billions more in education will have little payoff and has arguably created more problems than it has solved.

The journal Academic Questions recently addresses one aspect of the problem: the higher-education bubble. With the mounting cost of higher education — driven in part by the infusion of government subsidies — many new graduates are finding that the degree they’ve earned is not worth the investment.

At one time, a college degree was a virtual guarantor of secure, well-paying employment. Now, most college grads leave school with large debts — more than $27,000 on average.

A college degree also no longer signifies that the recipient is either well-educated in the traditional sense or that he has acquired specific skills suited to the labor market.

As the former president of St. John’s College in Santa Fe, John Agresto, argues in his essay, “The Liberal Arts Bubble,” were it not for the continued infusion of government subsidies and the influx of foreign students, the bubble might already have burst. Agresto points out that the liberal arts has fallen into a precipitous decline.

By 2008, the number of bachelor’s degrees had risen to 1.5 million Americans, but few of these degrees were in the traditional liberal arts. Barely 2 percent of BAs were awarded in history and only 3.5 percent in English literature. Agresto points out that more than a third of undergraduate degrees are now earned in business, health professions and education. Colleges have become trade schools — but far more expensive ones than their for-profit counterparts.

It’s no wonder that students have fled the liberal arts. For centuries, the liberal arts passed on what was best in Western civilization. Agresto explains that what kept Americans from forsaking the liberal arts in favor of the purely utilitarian, despite our practical bent, was that our youth should be encouraged “to pursue inquiry into serious and perennial questions.”

But he also notes that the humanities in particular were considered the “Keepers of the Culture” at a time when we believed we had a culture worth keeping and passing on. Since the 1960s, however, our culture has been under attack, our history rewritten as one of unmitigated oppression and the values our Founders and subsequent generations held dear reviled. Humanities courses in liberal arts colleges have replaced the canon of Western civilization with course offerings in gay scholarship, feminism, race studies and the like — all aimed to show our benighted past and to condition us to a more tolerant future.

Students have fled such courses in droves to pursue technical or professional skills in colleges that now award most of their degrees outside the liberal arts. Their parents — and increasingly the students themselves, through loans — are left footing the bill for degrees that neither pay off in the marketplace nor enrich the intellectual lives of those on whom they are conferred.

Not even Obama’s billions will keep this bubble from bursting.

Share

Leave a Reply

Search All Posts
Categories