Archive for the ‘Middle East’ Category
Wednesday, October 21st, 2020
THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
An Ex-Liberal Reluctantly Supports Trump
How historian Fred Siegel came to appreciate the president’s defense of ‘bourgeois values’ against the ‘clerisy.’
An Interview with Fred Stegel by Tunku Varadarajan Mr. Varadarajan is a Journal contributor and a fellow at New York University Law School’s Classical Liberal Institute. October 17, 2020
Brooklyn, N.Y.
Donald Trump can count at least one new supporter in this year’s election. “I had a close friend who’d been a business partner of Trump in the ’90s,” the critic and historian Fred Siegel tells me. “Trump ripped off a quarter of a million dollars from him. He told me this when we were discussing the election” four years ago. “Trump just said, ‘So, take me to court.’ I couldn’t vote for him.” Mr. Siegel couldn’t abide Hillary Clinton either, so he “slept through” the 2016 election. Next month he’ll be wide awake—though not woke—and will vote for Mr. Trump.
Joe Biden needn’t worry too much, perhaps. Mr. Siegel, 75, has only twice backed a winning presidential candidate since he reached voting age. But while he’s no bellwether, he does make an energetic case for the incumbent.
Mr. Siegel, a professor emeritus at New York’s Cooper Union and a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, says he overcame his distaste for Mr. Trump for three reasons. First, foreign policy: “Crushing ISIS, pulling us out of the Iran nuclear deal, moving our embassy to Jerusalem, and making fools of those people who insist that the Palestinian issue is at the heart of the Arab-Israeli conflict.” Second, by his “ability to withstand a prolonged coup attempt by the Democrats and the media,” which started with the Steele dossier: “If I’m saying what I find impressive about Trump, it’s that he’s survived. He has an extraordinary amount of arrogance, egotism, and self-confidence.”
Mr. Siegel’s third reason goes to the heart of his own political philosophy. He sees the president as a champion of “bourgeois values,” under threat from the “clerisy,” Mr. Siegel’s word for the dominant elites who “despise” those values. He regards Mr. Biden as a “captive” of this clerisy, and running mate Kamala Harris as the “embodiment of it.”
(more…)
Posted in Administrative State, Antifa, Bernie Sanders, Big Business, Big Government, Black Lives Matter, California, Cancel Culture, Class Warfare, Conservatism, Corporate Cronyism, Deep State, Democracy, Democrats, Demographics, Donald Trump, Economy, Election 2020, Elitism, Environmental Issues, Foreign Policy, Fracking, Free Speech, Global Warming, Globalists, Government Regulation, Identity Politics, Indoctrination of students, Iran Nuclear Deal, Israel, John F. Kennedy, Liberalism, Media, Middle East, Multiculturalism, National Defense, Obama, Obama Administraiton and Policy, Palestine, Political Correctness, Populism, Progressive Movement, Radical Left, Resistance, Social Justice, Socialism, Totalitarian, U.S. Presidents, White Privilege, Wokeness | No Comments »
Sunday, October 11th, 2020
VIDEO – COVERT CASH – $ BILLIONS FLOWING INTO OUR UNIVERSITIES FROM CORRUPT FOREIGN COUNTRIES
CLARION PROJECT
COVERT CASH – FULL FILM: What US universities don’t want you to know about their foreign funding September 1, 2020
Posted in China, Education, FBI, FBI Director, Indoctrination of students, Marxism, Middle East, North Korea, Radical Islam, Radical Left, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Totalitarian, Transparency, Videos | No Comments »
Sunday, October 4th, 2020
PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP’S ACCOMPLISHMENTS LIST:
GOVERNMENT ECONOMY NATIONAL SECURITY
Posted in Big Business, Big Government, Border Security, China, Conservatism, Democracy, Department of Education, Dept of Defense, Donald Trump, Economy, Education, Election 2020, Energy, Environmental Issues, Environmental Protection Agency-, Europe, Foreign Policy, Free Enterprise, Global Warming, Globalists, Government Regulation, Government Waste and Fraud, Illegal Immigration, Industry, Iran, Iran Nuclear Deal, ISIS Terror Group, Legal Issues, Marxism, Medical/Drugs, Middle East, Military, National Defense, Nationalism, NATO, North Korea, Nuclear Energy/Weapons, Obama Administraiton and Policy, Open Borders, Palestine, Patriotic, Police/law enforcement, Political Corruption, Radical Islam, Radical Left, Regulations, Religion, Religious Freedom, Russia, Sovereignty, Space Exploration, Taxation, Taxes, Terrorism, Trade Agreements, Transparency, U.N., Ukraine | No Comments »
Tuesday, September 29th, 2020
Liberal warnings about Trump’s Middle East policy have proven embarrassingly wrong
| September 18, 2020
President Trump took a dramatically different approach to the Middle East than his predecessor, and at every step, former Obama-Biden foreign policy officials and their allies repeatedly warned of catastrophic results. Yet not only have the dire warnings failed to pass, but there have been historic breakthroughs for peace in the region.
The Democratic Alliance Initiative, a new conservative foreign policy group, has published a report looking at several high-profile decisions Trump has made and examining statements made at the time by former Obama-Biden officials, ambassadors, and think tank experts. The results are not pretty.
When Trump made the correct decision to withdraw from the disastrous Iran deal, Joe Cirincione, president of the Ploughshares Fund (a key outside supporter of the deal), predicted, “We are truly on a path toward war in the Middle East.” Colin Kahl, who was Joe Biden’s national security adviser when he was vice president, declared that “war drums” were “already sounding.”
When Trump ordered the killing of Iranian terrorist mastermind Qassem Soleimani, it was also supposed to bring war. Sen. Tim Kaine, the 2016 Democratic vice presidential candidate, claimed the killing “has brought us to the brink of another war in the Middle East.” Sen. Chris Murphy said that Trump may have set off a “potential massive regional war.” And Susan Rice, the former National Security Council adviser to Barack Obama rumored to have been on Biden’s shortlist for running mate, predicted a series of escalations, concluding, “It’s hard to envision how this ends short of war.”
The bombastic declarations also extended to Trump’s actions in support of Israel.
(more…)
Posted in Anti Semitism, Council of Foreign Relations, Deep State, Democrats, Dept of Defense, Donald Trump, Election 2020, Foreign Policy, George W. Bush, Hillary Clinton, Intelligence, Iran Nuclear Deal, Israel, Israeli Prime Minister, Jihad, Liberalism, Media, Middle East, Military, National Defense, Nationalism, Obama, Obama Administraiton and Policy, Progressive Movement, Radical Islam, Radical Left, Resistance, Terrorism | No Comments »
Friday, September 18th, 2020
After 9/11, Biden Wanted to Send $200 Million to Islamic Terrorists
SEP 15, 2020 9:00 AM BY DANIEL GREENFIELD
“This,” Joe Biden announces, “is what I’ve spent my entire adult life preparing for.” It’s exactly three Tuesdays since the September attacks, and Biden is presiding over a morning meeting of his committee staffers…
At the Tuesday-morning meeting with committee staffers, Biden launches into a stream-of-consciousness monologue about what his committee should be doing, before he finally admits the obvious: “I’m groping here.”
Then he hits on an idea: America needs to show the Arab world that we’re not bent on its destruction. “Seems to me this would be a good time to send, no strings attached, a check for $200 million to Iran,” Biden declares.
Biden’s response to an attack by Islamic terrorists was a proposal to send $200 million to Islamic terrorists. The Obama-Biden administration topped that be sending billions to Iran. And Biden’s campaign platform calls for going back to those days.
But this is the same Joe Biden who threatened to impeach Bush if he tried to take out Iran’s nukes.
Waging a presidential campaign amid rising tensions with Iran 12 years ago, Joe Biden, then a senator from Delaware, had a warning for President George W. Bush should he decide to take military action without congressional authorization.
“I want it on the record, and I want to make it clear,” Biden said. “If he does, I will move to impeach him.”
And around whom allegations of Iranian funding have lingered.
Kaveh Mohseni, a spokesman for the Student Movement Coordination Committee for Democracy in Iran, calls Biden “a great friend of the mullahs.” He notes that Bidens election campaigns “have been financed by Islamic charities of the Iranian regime based in California and by the Silicon Iran network,” a loosely-knit group of wealthy Iranian-American businessmen and women seeking to end the U.S. trade embargo on Iran. “In exchange, the senator does his best to aid the mullahs,” Mohseni argues. Biden’s ties to pro-Tehran lobbying groups are no secret.
(more…)
Posted in 9/11, American History, CAIR, Deep State, Democrats, Election 2020, Foreign Policy, Globalists, Hezbollah, International Affairs, Iran, Iran Nuclear Deal, Jihad Watch, Joe Biden, Liberalism, Middle East, Military, National Defense, Political Corruption, Progressive Movement, Radical Left, Transparency | No Comments »
Wednesday, September 16th, 2020
Its been an amazing past few weeks of watching the first couple of middle east countries come to normalize relations with Israel. In fact, today as I was watching the DOW drop from its highs of the day to negative territory moments before the close, President Trump hinted that Saudi Arabia might soon be joining these countries in recognizing Israel. The DOW went from negative to positive territory in a matter of a minute or two. A very good omen of things to come – a possible Nobel Peace prize for our president ! Nancy
THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
The Long Road to Israel’s Very Good Month
The Jewish state has become too valuable to the Arab world to be treated as a pariah.
by Walter Russell Mead September 15, 2020
Not since May 1948, when both the U.S. and the Soviet Union recognized the state of Israel in the critical weeks of its war for independence, has Israel had a diplomatic month like this. On Aug. 13, the United Arab Emirates and Israel signed an agreement to normalize relations, with the formal ceremony to be held Tuesday in Washington with President Trump. On Sept. 11, Bahrain followed suit. The Palestinian Authority, holding the rotating chair of the Arab League, introduced a resolution condemning the U.A.E. move at a Zoom session of Arab foreign ministers, but in a shocking departure from past practice, the motion failed to pass. On Sept. 13 another Arab nation, Oman, issued a statement of support for Bahrain’s decision to normalize relations.
Meanwhile, defying pressure from the European Union and in exchange for Israeli recognition of Kosovo’s independence, Kosovo became the first Muslim-majority country in the world to agree to place an embassy in Jerusalem in another Trump-brokered deal. (The status of a similar pledge from Serbia isn’t clear.)
With Saudi Arabia allowing flights from Israel to the U.A.E. to pass over its territory and Morocco reported to be close to allowing direct flights to the Jewish state, something of a tipping point seems to have been reached in the Middle East. Resentment of Zionism and sympathy for the Palestinians will no longer be allowed to interfere with what embattled Arab rulers see as a vital relationship.
These changes are evolutionary rather than revolutionary. Arab opposition to Israel’s existence has never been as unanimous or implacable as casual observers sometimes assume. Geopolitically, conservative Arab states have long understood that their interests and Israel’s are connected.
The strongest force in international politics is driving the change: fear. The Arab world as a whole is confronting its greatest crisis since the collapse of the Ottoman Empire. Iraq and Syria, once pillars of Arab nationalism and strength, can barely hold themselves together. Yemen and Libya are sunk in bitter civil wars. Egypt, whose economy is staggering as the pandemic slashes its income from tourism and trade, can barely manage its own security, much less export stability to the rest of the Arab world. Lebanon, for so long a financial and cultural capital of the Arab world, suffers from a failing state and Hezbollah’s heavy hand.
(more…)
Posted in Anti Semitism, Donald Trump, Egypt, Election 2020, Energy, Foreign Policy, Fracking, Hamas, Hezbollah, History, International Affairs, Iran, Iran Nuclear Deal, Israel, Jihad, Joe Biden, Liberalism, Libya, Middle East, Muslim Brotherhood, Nuclear Energy/Weapons, Obama Administraiton and Policy, Radical Islam, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Technology, Terrorism, Turkey, U.N. | No Comments »
Friday, September 11th, 2020
The author of this article is world renowned Ayaan Hirsi Ali and her very extensive bio can be read by clicking on this link
Nancy
What Islamists and ‘Wokeists’ Have in Common
Adherents of both pursue ideological purity, refuse to engage in debate and demand submission
by Ayaan Hirsi AliMs. Hirsi Ali is a research fellow at the Hoover Institution and founder of the AHA Foundation. She served as a member of the Dutch Parliament from 2003-2006.
September 11, 2020
excerpt from this article: Both ideologies aim to tear down the existing system and replace it with utopias that always turn out to be hellish anarchies: Islamic State in Raqqa, the Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone in Seattle. Both are collectivist: Group identity trumps the individual. Both tolerate—and often glorify—violence carried out by zealots.
This Sept. 11, then, let’s dismiss the fairy stories about the enemies of a free society. Their grievances aren’t merely economic and they won’t be satisfied with jobs or entitlements. Their motivations are ideological and they will be satisfied only with power.
I cling to the hope that most Americans are still willing as a nation to fight and, if necessary, to die to preserve our freedoms, our rights, our customs, our history. That was the spirit of Flight 93. It was the spirit that ultimately defeated al Qaeda and Islamic State. But it is not the spirit of today’s “woke” protesters. And it is time that we all woke up to that reality.
There were many American heroes on 9/11, but the greatest were the passengers and crew of Flight 93. Not only did they avert what al Qaeda planned—a direct hit on the White House—but they also embodied Patrick Henry’s credo “Give me liberty, or give me death!”
Do those words still have a meaning in the America of 2020? For two decades, I have opposed the fanatical illiberalism of those strands of Islam that gave rise to al Qaeda. I broke with my Somali family and ultimately with their faith because I believed that it is human freedom that should be sacrosanct, not antiquated doctrines that demand submission by the individual.
So implacable are the proponents of Shariah that I have faced repeated death threats. Yet I have always consoled myself that, in the U.S., freedom of conscience and expression rank above any set of religious beliefs. It was partly for this reason that I moved here and became a citizen in 2013.
It never occurred to me that free speech would come under threat in my newly adopted country. Even when I first encountered what has come to be known as “cancel culture”—in 2014 I was invited to receive an honorary degree at Brandeis University and then ungraciously disinvited—I didn’t fret too much. I was inclined to dismiss the alliance of campus leftists and Islamists as a lunatic fringe.
But the power of the illiberal elements in the American left has grown, not just on campus but in the media and many corporations. They have inculcated in a generation of students an ideology that has much more in common with the intolerant doctrines of a religious cult than with the secular political thought I studied at Holland’s Leiden University.
(more…)
Posted in 9/11, Africa, American History, Anti Semitism, Anti-Capitalists, Antifa, Black Lives Matter, Caliphate, Cancel Culture, Class Warfare, Cloward-Piven, Critical Race Theory, Cultural Marxism, Democracy, Demographics, Dictators, Education, Election 2020, Europe, Free Speech, Identity Politics, Indoctrination of students, ISIS Terror Group, Liberalism, Marxism, Middle East, Multiculturalism, National Defense, Osama Bin Laden, Patriotic, Political Correctness, Progressive Movement, Racism, Radical Islam, Radical Left, Religion, Shariah Law, Social Justice, Socialism, Sovereignty, Terrorism, Totalitarian, Transparency, Tyranny, Violent Protestors, Wokeness | No Comments »
Saturday, August 1st, 2020
WASHINGTON EXAMINER
Who Is Black Lives Matter?
| July 23, 2020
EXCERPT FROM THIS ARTICLE: The co-founders of Black Lives Matter are avowed Marxists. At least one names a convicted cop killer among her heroes. A key mentor in building and shaping the group is a two-time vice presidential candidate for the Communist Party USA. The national organization is financially supported through a leftist group whose board of directors includes a convicted terrorist. A 2017 report from Black Lives Matter describes its founders, Alicia Garza, Patrisse Khan-Cullors, and Opal Tometi, as “three radical Black organizers.” The women espouse Marxism and openly push radical identity politics.
Susan Rosenberg was listed as vice chair of the board of directors for Thousand Currents, BLM’s financial sponsor, until the website was pulled down in late June. She had been a member of a radical leftist revolutionary militant group known as the May 19th Communist Organization, which was affiliated with the Weather Underground terrorist group and the radical Black Liberation Army. She was convicted on weapons and explosives charges and sentenced to 58 years in prison, serving 16 years behind bars before being pardoned by President Bill Clinton at the end of his second term in January 2001.
” Black Lives Matter” is more popular than either President Trump or Joe Biden, the presumptive Democratic nominee, according to recent polling. The online research firm Civiqs found in June that voters approved of the movement by a 28-point margin. Rasmussen found 62% of likely voters viewed it favorably and 32% very favorably.
This demonstrates that there is a national consensus that the lives of black fellow citizens matter, which has not always been the case in our history. It also suggests strong support for better, fairer policing in minority communities. But that seems far more likely to be because large majorities believe in the principle of the Declaration of Independence that all men are created equal rather than because they support the agenda of the organization with the innocuous-sounding name, Black Lives Matter.
Fact is, “black lives matter” is a matter of common decency entirely separate from the activist, ideological, left-wing agenda of the BLM group. That organization has stated aims that go far beyond addressing police brutality. Its goals include, without apology, the upending of American society. Yet it has gained massively more attention, support, and money since the death of George Floyd, an unarmed black man, in Minneapolis police custody. It is therefore important that the public, much of which thinks that by supporting BLM, they are backing obviously decent and humane reforms, knows enough to make the distinction between the idea and the ideologues hijacking it.
(more…)
Posted in American History, Anti Semitism, Anti-Capitalists, Antifa, Bill Ayers, Black Lives Matter, Class Warfare, Clinton, Cloward-Piven, Cultural Marxism, Democrats, Demographics, Diversity, Donald Trump, Election 2020, Fascism, FBI, Identity Politics, Israel, Joe Biden, Justice Department, Legal Issues, Liberalism, Marxism, Middle East, Multiculturalism, Palestine, Police/law enforcement, Political Correctness, Progressive Movement, Protestors, Radical Left, Resistance, Russia, Social Justice, Socialism, Terrorism, Totalitarian, Transparency, Violent Protestors, Women's Issues | No Comments »
Sunday, July 19th, 2020
If you have wondered why Islamic terror attacks have become less frequent, look no further. Muslims have been told to run for elected office where they can become influential in American politics. Also, they all run for office as Democrats……..Nancy
‘Building Power for Muslims in Politics’
The push to place Muslims in elected offices
JUL 18, 2020 5:00 PM BY ROBERT SPENCER
Robert Spencer is the director of Jihad Watch and a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. He is author of 21 books, including the New York Times bestsellers The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades) and The Truth About Muhammad. His latest book is Rating America’s Presidents: An America-First Look at Who Is Best, Who Is Overrated, and Who Was An Absolute Disaster. Follow him on Twitter here. Like him on Facebook here.
Editor’s note: In this monograph, Robert Spencer reveals the disquieting agenda and goals of those who are working hard to get Muslims elected to political office at the national, state, and local level. He shows how this initiative is gaining ground despite the frank anti-Americanism of Ilhan Omar and others – or is it because of that anti-Americanism?
Building power
“Invest in building power for Muslims in politics,” is the invitation from the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC) in a tweet on May 23, 2020, which features a photo of a smiling Salam al-Marayati, MPAC’s President and co-founder, with the notorious Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Ca.).[1] “We ensure that Muslim voices are heard by decision-makers in Washington, DC,” the tweet also says, “and we work diligently with policymakers like Rep. Adam Schiff to advocate for legislation that protects our communities.”[2]
To those who are aware of Adam Schiff’s central role in the attempt to frame President Trump for an impeachable offense and railroad him out of office, MPAC’s upbeat declaration of civic engagement was hardly reassuring. Even more disturbing was the fact that the stated goal was not something to the effect of “Help Muslims begin to participate in the American political process,” much less anything such as “Encourage Muslims to assimilate and adopt American values,” but “invest in building power for Muslims in politics.”
Building power. It is not unreasonable to surmise from this language that MPAC, at very least, appears to be aiming toward establishing a Muslim bloc in American politics, one that will wield power and influence with its Muslim identity at the forefront, contending for candidates and policies that it deems to be in line with Islamic teachings and values.
While there are many organizations in the United States defending their own group’s interests, MPAC’s endeavor is different from the others in that Islamic law, Sharia, is authoritarian by nature, denying the freedom of speech, as well as aggressive, expansionist, and supremacist. In its classic formulations, Islamic law denies equality of rights to women and non-Muslims, and allows for a host of practices that are incompatible in numerous with American principles and customs; discussion of these issues, however, has been effectively silenced by charges of “Islamophobia” and “bigotry,” not least from al-Marayati and MPAC itself.
Ann Corcoran of Refugee Resettlement Watch asked pointed questions in November 2019, after another Islamic advocacy group, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), sent out a press release celebrating the large number of Muslims who had just been elected to various offices. “One might wonder,” Corcoran wrote, “as I did here in 2007 why if refugees and Muslim migrants of all stripes were eager to assimilate did they need to place their people (representing their religion) into local, state and federal government? And, just imagine, I asked then, if we would blatantly say—we want Catholics, Jews, other Christians as our leaders—wouldn’t all hell break loose in the media? Yet, no one seems to care if CAIR says we are electing our people, Muslims, everywhere we can!”[3]
(more…)
Posted in 9/11, Anti Semitism, Anti-Capitalists, CAIR, Caliphate, Congress, Democrats, Demographics, Diversity, Donald Trump, Election 2016, Election 2018, Election 2020, Hamas, Hezbollah, Identity Politics, International Affairs, Iran, Iran Nuclear Deal, Islamic Refugee Migration, Israel, Jihad, Jihad Watch, Know Thy Enemy, Legal Immigration, Liberalism, Middle East, Migration - Islamic, Minority Candidates, Multiculturalism, Muslim Brotherhood, National Defense, NPR - National Public Radio, Obama Administraiton and Policy, Palestine, Political Correctness, Politics, Progressive Movement, Racism, Radical Islam, Radical Left, Refugee Resettlement Watch - Ann Corcoran, Religion, Religious Freedom, Reverend Wright, Social Justice, Terrorism, Totalitarian, Transparency, Women Candidates | No Comments »
Wednesday, May 27th, 2020
This is one of the best articles that Victor Davis Hanson has written and that is saying something as he is a brilliant writer and historian !!!! You’ll have to click on the link to read the article as National Review makes it too difficult to copy and paste their articles. Thanks to Martha Jenkins for sharing this exceptional article. Nancy
The Remains of an Administration
Obama’s policies are in tatters, and the worst scandals of his White House are coming to light.
by Victor Davis Hanson May 26,2020
“One is not struck by the truth until prompted quite accidentally by some external event.”
— Kazuo Ishiguro, The Remains of the Day
EXCERPT FROM THIS ARTICLE:
Gilded Socialism
Finally, the Obama post presidency did not help his cause. After eight years of lecturing the nation about the proper time to profit, or identifying the point after which there was no need to make additional money, or that private businesspeople did not really build their businesses, or the need to spread the wealth around, Obama liberated from office almost immediately rushed to the life of private jets and luxury yachts.
He signed multimillion-dollar tech and media deals characterized by requiring little expertise and less work but the promiscuous use of his brand and name. The erstwhile lecturer in chief about redlining and insidious bias bought a mansion in Washington’s toniest district; and after warning about rising seas, coastal flooding, and the need to lower them, he bought a seaside estate at Martha Vineyard, for the fire sale price of just under $12 million. In other words, he knew no time to stop profiting; there was no point when he had enough money; he saw no reason to spread his wealth around; and he really did build his own empire,
The less charismatic purveyors of the Obama legacy have not done well.
Hillary Clinton hired a foreign national to compile a dirty dossier on Trump and seed it in the Obama administration. She blew an election and ended up babbling and fixated permanently on her failure, before pathetically joining the “Resistance.” Joe Biden in his dotage may be spared her angst, given his own seeming inability to know exactly where he is and what he is supposed to say. Obama was supposed to have jump-started the careers of dozens of young, charismatic “diversity” imitators in the presidential arena, such as Cory Booker, Pete Buttigieg, Julian Castro, Deval Patrick, Kamala Harris, and Andrew Yang. All crashed and burned in the Democratic primaries, whether because they were not the Obama Adonis or because they reminded voters of his shallowness.
We were supposed to see a fundamental transformation of the country between 2009 and 2025, as the Obama-Clinton 16-year regnum finally made America right and correct. Instead, we witnessed eight years that ended in scandal whose full dimensions of criminality will take years to process.
NRO contributor VICTOR DAVIS HANSON is the Martin and Illie Anderson Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution and the author, most recently, of The Case for Trump. @vdhanson
Posted in Administrative State, American History, Big Government, CIA, Clinton, Community Organizers, Congress, Corruption/Crime, Deep State, Democrats, Donald Trump, Election 2016, Election 2020, Environmental Issues, FBI, FBI Director, Foreign Policy, Global Warming, Globalists, Globalization, Hillary Clinton, History, Illegal Immigration, Intelligence, International Affairs, Iran, Iran Nuclear Deal, Joe Biden, John Brennan, Justice Department, Liberalism, Media, Middle East, Mueller, National Defense, National Security Advisor, Obama, Obama Administraiton and Policy, Obamacare, Open Borders, Political Correctness, Political Corruption, Progressive Movement, Radical Left, Redistribution of Wealth, Resistance, Russia, Russian Reset, Same Sex Marriage, Social Justice, Socialism, Supreme Court, Transparency, Tyranny, Victor Davis Hanson, Women Candidates | No Comments »
