Archive for the ‘Demographics’ Category

EX-LIBERAL RELUCTANTLY SUPPORTS TRUMP

Wednesday, October 21st, 2020

 

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

An Ex-Liberal Reluctantly Supports Trump

How historian Fred Siegel came to appreciate the president’s defense of ‘bourgeois values’ against the ‘clerisy.’

An Interview with Fred Stegel by Tunku Varadarajan  Mr. Varadarajan is a Journal contributor and a fellow at New York University Law School’s Classical Liberal Institute.   October  17, 2020

Brooklyn, N.Y.

Donald Trump can count at least one new supporter in this year’s election. “I had a close friend who’d been a business partner of Trump in the ’90s,” the critic and historian Fred Siegel tells me. “Trump ripped off a quarter of a million dollars from him. He told me this when we were discussing the election” four years ago. “Trump just said, ‘So, take me to court.’ I couldn’t vote for him.” Mr. Siegel couldn’t abide Hillary Clinton either, so he “slept through” the 2016 election. Next month he’ll be wide awake—though not woke—and will vote for Mr. Trump.

Joe Biden needn’t worry too much, perhaps. Mr. Siegel, 75, has only twice backed a winning presidential candidate since he reached voting age. But while he’s no bellwether, he does make an energetic case for the incumbent.

Mr. Siegel, a professor emeritus at New York’s Cooper Union and a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, says he overcame his distaste for Mr. Trump for three reasons. First, foreign policy: “Crushing ISIS, pulling us out of the Iran nuclear deal, moving our embassy to Jerusalem, and making fools of those people who insist that the Palestinian issue is at the heart of the Arab-Israeli conflict.” Second, by his “ability to withstand a prolonged coup attempt by the Democrats and the media,” which started with the Steele dossier: “If I’m saying what I find impressive about Trump, it’s that he’s survived. He has an extraordinary amount of arrogance, egotism, and self-confidence.”

Mr. Siegel’s third reason goes to the heart of his own political philosophy. He sees the president as a champion of “bourgeois values,” under threat from the “clerisy,” Mr. Siegel’s word for the dominant elites who “despise” those values. He regards Mr. Biden as a “captive” of this clerisy, and running mate Kamala Harris as the “embodiment of it.”

(more…)

Share

WHY MANY AMERICAN JEWS VOTE DEMOCRAT

Friday, October 16th, 2020

 

www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/289202

Two different Jewish tribes choose different candidates

Many liberal Jews still care deeply about Israel and its security, but it is not their top priority. Op-ed.

 

By Jonathan S. Tobin    October 16, 2020

Jonathan S. Tobin is editor in chief of JNS—Jewish News Syndicate. Follow him on Twitter at: @jonathans_tobi

Among the least surprising poll numbers to be published recently were the results of the Pew Research Center survey that reports a sizable 70 percent of American Jews say they are voting for former Vice President Joe Biden, while 27 percent are planning to cast their ballots to re-elect President Donald Trump.

Those figures show that despite all that has happened in the last four tumultuous years, none of it has changed the minds of Jewish voters; in 2016, the exit polls produced similar results with 71 percent backing Hillary Clinton and 24 percent choosing Trump.

Equally unsurprising were the results of two other polls. One was an Ami magazine poll that showed that American Jews who identify as Orthodox backed Trump over Biden by a whopping 83 percent to 13 percent. Another, from I24News showed that 63 percent of Israelis preferred Trump while only 19 percent wanted Biden. That last number could be seen as a matter of self-interest on the part of Israelis. But about half of the respondents also made it clear that they thought their American cousins were mistaken with 48 percent saying that U.S. Jews were wrong to embrace the Democratic Party and 35 percent saying they were right to do so.

That Israelis like a president who likes them so much is hardly a shock in much the same way that most citizens of the Jewish state didn’t like President Barack Obama, despite the fact that most American Jews loved him.

But once we go beyond that obvious conclusion, how do we explain these clear differences? The glib response is to merely put it down to most American Jews being liberals, while the Orthodox and Israelis lean to the right. There’s truth in that, but the answer goes much further. The results say relatively little about the issues or the merits of the candidates and everything about the differences between the Orthodox and the non-Orthodox, as well as the contrasting nature of American and Israeli societies and their political cultures.

The only interesting thing to note about the Pew results is that many Biden and Trump supporters have a hard time understanding the people on the other side. To the majority who are generally liberal and loyal Democrats, the election isn’t so much about Biden as it is in opposing Trump, whom they believe isn’t merely wrong but the epitome of evil.

(more…)

Share

VIDEO – NEW YORK RABBI BEGS FOR PRESIDENT TRUMP TO HELP JEWISH COMMUNITY

Wednesday, October 14th, 2020

 

This video of a New York Jewish Rabbi is very informative.  He actually calls  New York Mayor Bill  DeBlasio a Communist and doesn’t have kind words for Cuomo either !  It is just plain stupid to single out and antagonize your constituents like Cuomo and DeBlasio have done.    Perhaps the New York Jewish community will not be so eager to vote for Democrats as they have been in the past !    We Republicans have a very large tent and they are most welcome to join us !!! .  The outspoken Rabbi also states that he is a  big fan of Hydroxychloroquine.  He had better be careful or the “speech police” are going to go after him !       Nancy

New York Rabbi Begs For President Trump To Help Jewish Community

Share

2 VIDEOS – MIAMI LATIN COMMUNITY RALLIES FOR TRUMP; VIETNAMESE COMMUNITY RALLY FOR TRUMP

Tuesday, October 13th, 2020

 

Both the Latin community that now lives in Florida   and the Vietnamese community have lived under totalitarian regimes and they know that they do not want to ever  live under any type of Socialism ever again.  They fled their former oppressive  countries to live in freedom in the United States.    Here are videos of the two groups supporting President Trump.   
 Nancy   Trump 2020 !  

VIDEO

‘Four more years.’ Vietnamese cross-country caravan rallies for Trump in Biloxi   October 8, 2020

A cross-country caravan of Vietnamese-American Trump supporters stopped in Biloxi to rally for the president’s re-election. The group is traveling across the country before their final stop in Washington D.C. for.a rally in front of the White House.
 
VIDEO 

Miami Anti-Socialist Caravan Makes History, Attracting 30,000 Vehicles

Police in Miami, Florida, estimated on Saturday that 30,000 vehicles joined a caravan expressing rejection of communism, socialism, and leftist totalitarian ideologies – an event of historic size and diversity, organizer Orlando Gutiérrez-Boronat told Breitbart News.
Share

VIDEO – MINORITY SUPPORTERS AT TRUMP RALLY

Monday, October 12th, 2020

 

VIDEO – A RALLY OF PEOPLE ORIGINALLY  FROM  MANY DIFFERENT COUNTRIES AND RACES AT A TRUMP RALLY STATING WHY THEY ARE VOTING FOR PRESIDENT TRUMP 

You Don’t Have to be WHITE to VOTE for President TRUMP 2020
Pass this video on. We follow President Trump wherever he goes on the campaign trail. And there’s something we’ve noticed a lot more of lately: a growing number of minorities are choosing to leave the Democratic Party to support President Trump. Blacks for Trump, Latinos for Trump, Muslims for Trump, Sikhs for Trump, LGBT for Trump, Amish for Trump, Hindus for Trump, Asians for Trump. You name it. “We’re fighting to give every American — all over the country, every single American — a future of dignity and purpose and of pride.” – President Donald J. Trump
 
Share

COVID-19 DECLARATION

Wednesday, October 7th, 2020

 

PLEASE READ AND, IF YOU AGREE,  SIGN THE DECLARATION ABOUT THE DAMAGING PHYSICAL AND MENTAL HEALTH IMPACTS OF THE COVID-19 POLICIES 
Please click on the link:   gbdeclaration.org 

The Great Barrington Declaration

As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection.

Coming from both the left and right, and around the world, we have devoted our careers to protecting people. Current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health. The results (to name a few) include lower childhood vaccination rates, worsening cardiovascular disease outcomes, fewer cancer screenings and deteriorating mental health – leading to greater excess mortality in years to come, with the working class and younger members of society carrying the heaviest burden. Keeping students out of school is a grave injustice.

Keeping these measures in place until a vaccine is available will cause irreparable damage, with the underprivileged disproportionately harmed.

Fortunately, our understanding of the virus is growing. We know that vulnerability to death from COVID-19 is more than a thousand-fold higher in the old and infirm than the young. Indeed, for children, COVID-19 is less dangerous than many other harms, including influenza.

As immunity builds in the population, the risk of infection to all – including the vulnerable – falls. We know that all populations will eventually reach herd immunity – i.e.  the point at which the rate of new infections is stable – and that this can be assisted by (but is not dependent upon) a vaccine. Our goal should therefore be to minimize mortality and social harm until we reach herd immunity.

The most compassionate approach that balances the risks and benefits of reaching herd immunity, is to allow those who are at minimal risk of death to live their lives normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest risk. We call this Focused Protection.

Adopting measures to protect the vulnerable should be the central aim of public health responses to COVID-19. By way of example, nursing homes should use staff with acquired immunity and perform frequent PCR testing of other staff and all visitors. Staff rotation should be minimized. Retired people living at home should have groceries and other essentials delivered to their home. When possible, they should meet family members outside rather than inside. A comprehensive and detailed list of measures, including approaches to multi-generational households, can be implemented, and is well within the scope and capability of public health professionals.

Those who are not vulnerable should immediately be allowed to resume life as normal. Simple hygiene measures, such as hand washing and staying home when sick should be practiced by everyone to reduce the herd immunity threshold. Schools and universities should be open for in-person teaching. Extracurricular activities, such as sports, should be resumed. Young low-risk adults should work normally, rather than from home. Restaurants and other businesses should open. Arts, music, sport and other cultural activities should resume. People who are more at risk may participate if they wish, while society as a whole enjoys the protection conferred upon the vulnerable by those who have built up herd immunity.

On October 4, 2020, this declaration was authored and signed in Great Barrington, United States, by:

Dr. Martin Kulldorff, professor of medicine at Harvard University, a biostatistician, and epidemiologist with expertise in detecting and monitoring of infectious disease outbreaks and vaccine safety evaluations.

Dr. Sunetra Gupta, professor at Oxford University, an epidemiologist with expertise in immunology, vaccine development, and mathematical modeling of infectious diseases.

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, professor at Stanford University Medical School, a physician, epidemiologist, health economist, and public health policy expert focusing on infectious diseases and vulnerable populations.

Co-signers

Medical and Public Health Scientists and Medical Practitioners

(more…)

Share

THE TRUTH ABOUT CRITICAL RACE THEORY

Tuesday, October 6th, 2020

 

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

The Truth About Critical Race Theory

Trump is right. Training sessions for government employees amounted to political indoctrination.

By Christopher F. Rufo  Mr. Rufo is director of the Discovery Institute’s Center on Wealth and Poverty.    October 5, 2020

Moderator Chris Wallace asked President Trump during last week’s debate why he “directed federal agencies to end racial-sensitivity training that addresses white privilege or critical race theory.” Mr. Trump answered: “I ended it because it’s racist.” Participants “were asked to do things that were absolutely insane,” he explained. “They were teaching people to hate our country.”

“Nobody’s doing that,” Joe Biden replied. He’s wrong.

My reporting on critical race theory in the federal government was the impetus for the president’s executive order, so I can say with confidence that these training sessions had nothing to do with developing “racial sensitivity.” As I document in detailed reports for City Journal and the New York Post, critical race theory training sessions in public agencies have pushed a deeply ideological agenda that includes reducing people to a racial essence, segregating them, and judging them by their group identity rather than individual character, behavior and merit.

The examples are instructive. At a series of events at the Treasury Department and federal financial agencies, diversity trainer Howard Rosstaught employees that America was “built on the backs of people who were enslaved” and that all white Americans are complicit in a system of white supremacy “by automatic response to the ways we’re taught.”

In accompanying documents, Mr. Ross argues that whites share an inborn oppressive streak. “Whiteness,” employees are told, “includes white privilege and white supremacy.” Consequently, whites “struggle to own their racism.” He instructs managers to conduct “listening sessions” in which black employees can speak about their experience and be “seen in their pain,” while white employees are instructed to “sit in the discomfort” and not “fill the silence with your own thoughts and feelings.” Members of “the group you’re allying with,” Mr. Ross says, are not “obligated to like you, thank you, feel sorry for you, or forgive you.” For training like this, Mr. Ross and his firm have been paid $5 million over 15 years, according to federal disclosures.

Share

VIDEO – BLACK CONSERVATIVE TURNS A BLACK BIDEN SUPPORTER INTO A TRUMP SUPPORTER

Tuesday, September 29th, 2020

 

Thanks to Dee Sams for sharing. this very encouraging video. The black community is finally waking up to how they have been told by the Democrats  for so many decades that they were oppressed  victims and that Trump is now here to change that narrative!   Nancy

VIDEO


youtu.be/Mt4hJLku860

 

Black Patriot  Turns a Black Biden Supporter Into a Trump Supporter

 

 

Share

2 VIDEOS – TOM FITTON/LOU DOBBS, TUCKER CARLSON – THE BAIL PROJECT

Saturday, September 26th, 2020

 

VIDEO – LOU DOBBS AND TOM FITTON ON NEWLY  RELEASED  FBI REPORTS  – SEPTEMBER  24, 2020 
Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton talks to FOX Business’ Lou Dobbs about the Mueller team investigation and General Michael Flynn.
VIDEO – TUCKER CARLSON – THE BAIL PROJECT SEPTEMBER 25, 2020
The Bail Project has paid more than $26 million in bail. The group says it has bailed out more than 12,000 suspected criminals. Who are these people? They’re people like Samuel Lee Scott of Chicago. Scott was in jail facing assault charges for punching his wife. After he hit her, he reportedly said he, quote, “might as well finish what (he) started since (she) was going to contact the police.” The Bail Project then came to the rescue. Hours after the group sprung him from jail, Scott allegedly beat his wife to death.
Share

2 VIDEOS – VIRUS MISINFORMATION AND THE COST OF THE LOCKDOWN

Thursday, September 17th, 2020

 

VIDEO – TUCKER CARLSON – SEPTEMBER 17, 2020

Tucker Carlson: US health officials ignored evidence coronavirus was intentionally created

Sep. 17, 2020 – 13:35 – Tucker Carlson monologue on coronavirus.

 VIDEO – What we learned about the virus and time to end  the lockdown.

Dr Scott Atlas is the Robert Wesson Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution 

   Interviewed by Peter Robinson of the Hoover Institution
Share
Search All Posts
Categories