Archive for the ‘Social Media’ Category

UK FATHER/MUSLIM GANG SCANDAL

Friday, January 10th, 2025

UK Father Whose Daughter Was Gang-Raped: “Police Told Me To Let It Go”

by Tyler Durden
Friday, Jan 10, 2025

Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity.news,

As the pedophile Muslim gang scandal has exploded into the mainstream this week in the UK, horrible accounts are being shared by fathers of some of the victims, with one relating how the police did nothing when he told them his daughter had been raped and advised him to “let it go” or he would “get arrested for being racist.”

Share

THE REVOLUTION OF 2024

Monday, November 18th, 2024
THE REVOLUTION OF 2024 -REAL CHANGE IS COMING !

The coming together of MAGA, MAHA, and DOGE represents decades of cultivation of disparate groups of dissidents who had not previously realized their common interests and common enemies.

Share

GEMS FROM TWITTER (X)

Sunday, November 10th, 2024

 

Tucker Carlson
@TuckerCarlson
What the hell is going on in the US Senate? Hours after Donald Trump wins the most conclusive mandate in 40 years, Mitch McConnell engineers a coup against his agenda by calling early leadership elections in the senate. Two of the three candidates hate Trump and what he ran on. One of them, John Cornyn, is an angry liberal whose politics are indistinguishable from Liz Cheney’s. The election is Wednesday, it’s by secret ballot, and it will determine whether or not the new administration succeeds. Rick Scott of Florida is the only candidate who agrees with Donald Trump. Call your senator and demand a public endorsement of Rick Scott. Don’t let McConnell get away with it again.

 

Liz Wheeler
@Liz_Wheeler
Trump is President-elect for two days:
– Stock market hits record high
– Migrant caravan at our border dissolves
– Hamas calls for end to war
– Bitcoin hits record high
– Putin ready to end Ukraine war
– Qatar kicks out Hamas leaders
– EU will buy U.S. gas not Russian gas
– Putin will sell oil in U.S. dollars
– Zelenskyy phones Trump & Elon
– NYC Mayor ends vouchers for illegals
– Mexico to stop migrants at U.S. border
– China wants to work peacefully with us
– Big U.S. company to move out of China
I repeat: Trump has been President-elect for two days.
Alex Berenson
@AlexBerenson
·
Nov 8
Imagine setting your party on fire to protect the rights of criminals, drug users, illegal immigrants, and men who want to use women’s bathrooms.
And then not understanding why you’ve lost.
Share

VIDEO, PHOTOS & ARTICLE – 11 FAMILY MEMBERS LOST IN HELENE

Tuesday, October 15th, 2024

 

VIDEO AND ARTICLE

NORTH CAROLINA

Family that lost 11 in Hurricane Helene mudslides says community sacrificed ‘life and limb’ to save each other

Craig family lived in North Carolina community, dubbed ‘Craigtown’ by locals, for 80 years

Share

X – TWITTER – 33 REASONS WHY NOT TO VOTE FOR HARRIS

Tuesday, October 15th, 2024

 

https://x.com/billackman/status/1844802469680873747?s=42&fbclid=IwY2xjawF6m-BleHRuA2FlbQIxMAABHV4B6qHnlC-40QvERjA43P_SWg_aWv39D_dmuxBLdDO-zNNMZk8RgqrsMA_aem_OV2fOzlm226NIElWrpPBRQ

 

 

Conversation

Bill Ackman
@BillAckman

A number of my good friends and family have been surprised about my decision to support

for president. They have been surprised because my political giving history has been mostly to Democrats, my voting registration has typically been Democrat (in NY, you must be registered to the party in order to vote in the primary, and usually the Republican candidate has no chance to win), and many of our philanthropic initiatives have supported issues that are consistent with Democratic priorities. All of the above said, I have always considered myself to be a centrist and/or moderate, and I have voted for the candidate and supported the issues and policies that I believe are in the best interest of the country. Some have accused me of supporting Trump because doing so will somehow benefit me financially. Fortunately, I do not need any financial benefits as I and my family have well more than we need. I have also committed to give away the substantial majority of my resources at or by the time I am no longer, so I don’t consider personal financial benefits in the determination of whom I support for office. Some have suggested that I am supporting Trump because I am seeking a position in his administration. To be clear, I haven’t been offered one and I wouldn’t take a job in the administration (I love my job and it is the wrong time in my life to work in an administration). I will, however, do everything else I can to help the president succeed in helping our country and its citizens. All of the above said, I am an investor who manages funds that own some of the best, principally American, businesses in the world. In a better governed and managed America, these business will do better and increase in value faster. One might therefore argue that being ‘long’ America is somehow a conflict, so I thought to disclose this potential ‘conflict’ here. Some of my friends and family who support

are ok with my supporting Trump, but don’t want me to attempt to convince others to support him. Because I strongly believe that a Trump administration will be better for the country and the world than a Harris administration, I think it is important to share my thinking to the extent it helps others come to the right conclusion. Three months ago, when I endorsed Trump on the day of the first assassination attempt, I promised to share my thinking about why I came to this conclusion in a future more detailed post. I intend to do so in possibly more than one post, with the first, this one, explaining the actions and policies of the Biden/Harris administration and Democratic Party that were the catalysts for my losing total confidence in the administration and the Party. To be clear, my decision to vote for Trump is not an endorsement of everything he has done or will do because he is an imperfect man. Unlike a marriage or a business partnership where there are effectively unlimited alternatives, in this election, we have only two viable choices. Of the two, I believe that Trump is by far the superior candidate despite his flaws and mistakes he has made in the past. As always, I welcome your feedback on how I could be wrong and on how the below actions and policies I outline below might actually have been good for America. I have always believed that the best way to get to the truth is to hear the best arguments on all sides of an issue. While the 33 actions I describe below are those of the Democratic Party and the Biden/Harris administration, they are also the actions and policies that unfortunately our most aggressive adversaries would likely implement if they wanted to destroy America from within, and had the ability to take control of our leadership. These are the 33: (1) open the borders to millions of immigrants who were not screened for their risk to the country, dumping them into communities where the new immigrants overwhelm existing communities and the infrastructure to support the new entrants, at the expense of the historic residents,

(2) introduce economic policies and massively increase spending without regard to their impact on inflation and the consequences for low-income Americans and the increase in our deficit and national debt,
(3) withdraw from Afghanistan, abandoning our local partners and the civilians who worked alongside us in an unprepared, overnight withdrawal that led to American casualties and destroyed the lives of Afghani women and girls for generations, against the strong advice of our military leadership, and thereafter not showing appropriate respect for their loss at a memorial ceremony in their honor,
(4) introduce thousands of new and unnecessary regulations in light of the existing regulatory regime that interfere with our businesses’ ability to compete, restraining the development of desperately needed housing, infrastructure, and energy production with the associated inflationary effects,
(5) modify the bail system so that violent criminals are released without bail,
Share

GEORGE SOROS BUYS RADIO STATIONS BEFORE ELECTION

Tuesday, October 1st, 2024

 

George Soros’ ‘unprecedented’ purchase of Audacy radio stations before election investigated by lawmakers: ‘New shortcut’

Share

JONATHAN TURLEY – FREE SPEECH AND KAMALA HARRIS

Sunday, September 8th, 2024

 

“That Has to Stop”: Harris Denounces Unfettered Free Speech in 2019 CNN Interview

previously wrote how a Harris-Walz Administration would be a nightmare for free speech. Both candidates have shown pronounced anti-free speech values. Now, X owner Elon Musk and former independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. have posted a Harris interview to show the depths of the hostility of Harris to unfettered free speech. I have long argued that Trump and the third-party candidates should make free speech a central issue in this campaign. That has not happened. Kennedy was the only candidate who was substantially and regularly talking about free speech in this election. Yet, Musk and Kennedy are still trying to raise the chilling potential of a Harris-Walz Administration.

In my book “The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage,” I discuss how the Biden-Harris Administration has proven to be the most anti-free speech administration since John Adams. That includes a massive censorship system described by one federal judge as perfectly “Orwellian.”

In the CNN interview, Harris displays many of the anti-free speech inclinations discussed earlier. She strongly suggests that X should be shut down if it does not yield to demands for speech regulation.

What is most chilling is how censorship and closure are Harris’s default positions when faced with unfettered speech. She declares to CNN that such unregulated free speech “has to stop” and that there is a danger to the country when people are allowed to “directly speak[] to millions and millions of people without any level of oversight and regulation.”

Harris discussed her view that then-President Trump’s Twitter account should be shut down because the public had to be protected from harmful viewpoints.

“And when you’re talking about Donald Trump, he has 65 million Twitter followers, he has proven himself to be willing to obstruct justice – just ask Bob Mueller. You can look at the manifesto from the shooter in El Paso to know that what Donald Trump says on Twitter impacts peoples’ perceptions about what they should and should not do.”

(more…)

Share

VIDEO – OUR FREEDOMS ARE GONE – SAM FADDIS

Saturday, September 7th, 2024
VIDEO   SAM FADDIS – RETIRED  CIA OPERATIONS OFFICER
Grace Chong ����
@gc22gc

Someday is today. Our freedoms are gone. Bannon is in prison, and the Democratic Party is trying to imprison Donald J. Trump. Don’t sit in your basement and go into a fetal position. Get up, move, and do something to help us win.

Share

VICTOR DAVIS HANSON – REINVENTING KAMALA HARRIS

Saturday, September 7th, 2024

 

Can They Really Reinvent Kamala Harris in 70 Days?

Share

THE FED’S ELECTION INTERFERENCE DIDN’T STOP AFTER 2020

Tuesday, August 13th, 2024

 

Should we be blamed for not trusting the Justice Department and specifically the FBI ?  I am currently reading ‘Government Gangsters’ by Kash Patel and it is appalling how deeply involved these agencies, especially the FBI, were in trying to frame and take down former President Trump.  ‘Government Gangsters’ is a “must read” !   Nancy   

The Feds’ Election Interference Didn’t Stop After 2020, It Just Got More Sophisticated

By Ben Weingarten

Ben Weingarten is editor at large for RealClearInvestigations. He is a senior contributor to The Federalist, columnist at Newsweek, and a contributor to the New York Post and Epoch Times, among other publications. Subscribe to his newsletter at weingarten.substack.com, and follow him on Twitter: @bhweingarten.

August 12, 2024

America’s speech police are reassembling to once again influence our elections. At the same time the security state is creating potential pretexts for renewed censorship by issuing warnings of cyberattacks that could “hinder public access to election information,” they are also reprising old claims of coming Russian election interference on behalf of Donald Trump.

The little-noticed development comes in a report from the Justice Department’s Office of Inspector General (OIG) on the DOJ’s efforts to “Coordinate Information Sharing About Foreign Malign Influence Threats to U.S. Elections” — a euphemism for the chief law enforcement agency’s prior censorship activities.

During the 2020 election, as revealed in litigationcongressional oversight, and reporting, national security and law enforcement agencies used the threat of foreign misinformation and disinformation on social media to U.S. elections as a pretext to surveil and suppress domestic news and opinions deemed derogatory to our ruling regime.

An alphabet soup of agencies coerced, cajoled, and colluded directly and via cutouts with social media companies to get those companies to squash all manner of wrongthink on election integrity and outcomes at mass scale.

While the OIG explicitly omitted the “FBI’s information sharing with social media companies with respect to domestic actors” from its report, the DOJ’s response to the office’s recommendations will likely have substantial bearing on Americans’ speech.

That response, appended to the report, comes in the form of a DOJ memo revealing that the law enforcement agency has now codified its protocols for reporting purported “foreign malign influence” information with social media companies, and is redoubling its efforts to do so in the run-up to the 2024 election.

In fact, the FBI has been implementing new Standard Operating Procedures since February.

Under those procedures, the FBI is required to identify “specific, credible, and articulable facts that provide high confidence for assessing that the information at issue relates to activity attributable to a foreign government, foreign non-state actor, or their proxy engaged in an FMI [foreign malign influence] operation.”

The Bureau is also required to include a disclaimer — akin to one authorities often included in censorship requests from 2020 — explaining it “does not request or expect” recipients to take any specific action based on shared information.

A related summary of the procedures posted on the FBI website notes that communications to social media platforms must make clear that the FBI “does not investigate solely based on First Amendment-protected activity.” [Emphasis mine]

On top of implementing these procedures, the memo adds that the FBI will be resuming regular meetings with social media companies regarding foreign malign influence threats; that FBI field offices will be engaging in outreach efforts to foster relationships with social media companies in their jurisdictions, in coordination with the FBI’s “Foreign Influence Task Force” — a key cog in censorship activities in 2020; and that senior DOJ officials will be making the rounds with relevant stakeholders to discuss their information sharing strategy.

The Justice Department assures us that its extensive interaction with Big Tech companies is of a completely passive nature, solely concerning clear-cut foreign influence operations, and will strictly protect our right to free speech.

(more…)

Share
Search All Posts
Categories