June 9, 2021
Sidney Explains It All …
Dear Patriots,
We have shared with you a small clip of Sidney’s appearance in Dallas over Memorial Day weekend.The whole 60 minutes of this amazingly open and honest event and it is well worth your time to watch it. BUT, we know that many of you are busy so we have pulled out the nuggets and offer a 13 minute option.
Instead of a canned speech, Sidney suggested that she be asked questions by The Right Side radio host Doug Billings. This is an unscripted interview with no subject off the table.
This is Sidney at her best, sharing her vast experience and knowledge on where we are as a country and how to save it.
Sidney explains it all!Long version: (link)
vimeo.com/560023045Short version:
rumble.com/vi9eon-sidney-powell-for-god-and-country-memorial-day-weekend-short-version.html
Doug Billings website: dougbillings.us
###
In just the past few days, we have seen an avalanche of news from around the world, proving the lies the government has told us about all things related to Covid-CCP.
Because most of this will get little discussion or coverage in the Drive By Media, we are sending you the links so you can be informed. Please read these stories and share them with others.
1- Have we lost a generation with the horrible decisions by corrupt governments?
A sacrificed generation’: psychological scars of Covid on young may have lasting impactwww.theguardian.com/world/2021/jun/02/a-sacrificed-generation-psychological-scars-of-covid-on-young-may-have-lasting-impact
Covid-19 policies risk leaving psychological and socioeconomic scars on millions of young people across Europe, with far-reaching consequences for them and society, a wide-ranging Guardian project has revealed.
Authored by Tim Hinchliffe via GlobalResearch.ca,
Say it’s 2014 and you’ve had this idea for a technocratic Great Reset of the world economy for some time now, but it only works if the entire planet is rocked by a pandemic. How do you go about selling your idea?
“The pandemic represents a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reimagine, and reset our world to create a healthier, more equitable, and more prosperous future” — Klaus Schwab, WEF
If you are World Economic Forum (WEF) Founder Klaus Schwab, you attempt to sell your vision of a global Utopia via a Great Reset of the world order in three simple steps:
- Announce your intention to revamp every aspect of society with global governance, and keep repeating that message
- When your message isn’t getting through, simulate fake pandemic scenarios that show why the world needs a great reset
- If the fake pandemic scenarios aren’t persuasive enough, wait a couple months for a real global crisis to occur, and repeat step one
It took Schwab and the Davos elite about six years to watch their great reset ideology grow from a tiny Swiss seed in 2014 to a European super-flower pollinating the entire globe in 2020.
The so-called “Great Reset” promises to build “a more secure, more equal, and more stable world” if everyone on the planet agrees to “act jointly and swiftly to revamp all aspects of our societies and economies, from education to social contracts and working conditions.”
But it wouldn’t have been possible to contemplate materializing such an all-encompassing plan for a new world order without a global crisis, be it manufactured or of unfortunate happenstance, that shocked society to its core.
“In the end, the outcome was tragic: the most catastrophic pandemic in history with hundreds of millions of deaths, economic collapse and societal upheaval” — Clade X pandemic simulation (May, 2018)
So, in May, 2018, the WEF partnered with Johns Hopkins to simulate a fictitious pandemic — dubbed “Clade X” — to see how prepared the world be if ever faced with such a crisis.
A little over a year later, the WEF once again teamed-up with Johns Hopkins, along with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, to stage another pandemic exercise called Event 201 in October, 2019.
Both simulations concluded that the world wasn’t prepared for a global pandemic.
And a few short months following the conclusion of Event 201, which specifically simulated a coronavirus outbreak, the World Health Organization (WHO) officially declared that the coronavirus had reached pandemic status on March 11, 2020.
PLEASE CLICK ON THE ABOVE LINK TO VIEW THE ENTIRE ARTICLE AND A VIDEO
The University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB) in Galveston is a major virus research center heavily funded by the National Institutes of Health, especially Dr. Anthony Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
In August 2020, UTMB was designated by Anthony Fauci as one of the ten Centers for Research in Emerging Infectious Diseases and newly funded by a NIAID grant totaling $82 million.
Perhaps not coincidentally, Fauci also designated Peter Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance, a long-time collaborator with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, as another Center for Research in Emerging Infectious Diseases, awarding it $7.5 million.
UTMB is also the home of the Department of Defense-funded Center for Biodefense and Emerging Infectious Diseases.
UTMB has one of the few Biosafety Level 4 facilities for containing and conducting research on the world’s most dangerous viruses.
One does not need to dig very deeply to find that UTMB has been infiltrated by scientists of People’s Liberation Army, some believed to be linked to China’s biowarfare program.
This is happening right now, not something that happened ten years ago.
Dinesh D’Souza: Emerging Totalitarian Mindset Seen in People Reporting on NeighborsA new phenomenon is spreading in the United States, where people are being encouraged to report on their neighbors on partisan legal issues, and for violating corporate rules. To learn more about this emerging “totalitarian mindset,” we sat down for an interview with writer, author, and filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza.
Dinesh D’Souza: Emerging Totalitarian Mindset Seen in People Reporting on NeighborsDownload our app to read more at ept.ms/DownloadApp3rd VIDEO BELOWVIDEO – NAOMI wOLF – 10 STEPS TO TYRANNY
Naomi Wolf, a former adviser to the Clinton administration, is a prolific author and Yale University graduate. She also received a prestigious Rhodes Scholarship that allowed her to complete her Ph.D. in English and literature at Oxford University in 2015. Eight years before that, she wrote a book called “The End of America,” which is the topic of this interview.
“The End of America” was published in 2007. At the end of this article, you will find a playlist of three videos in which she reads select chapters of the book. You can also download the first and last chapters for free on the publisher’s website, chelseagreen.com.1
| www.justfacts.com/news_covid-19_essential_facts |
|
Essential Facts About Covid-19
By James D. Agresti
December 10, 2020
Updated 4/16/21
18 Reasons I Won’t Be Getting a COVID Vaccine
“I’m not here to pick a fight with anyone, just to walk you through some of what I’ve read, my lingering questions and explain why I can’t make sense of these COVID vaccines.”
By Christian Elliot – The Defender – Christian Elliot is a certified personal trainer, life coach and a certified nutrition coach
A few friends have asked my thoughts on the COVID jab(s) so I thought it was time to write an article on the topic.
Knowing how contentious this issue is, part of me would rather just write about something else. But I believe the discussion/news is so one-sided that I should speak up.
As I always strive to do, I promise to do my best to be level-headed and non-hysterical.
I’m not here to pick a fight with anyone, just to walk you through some of what I’ve read, my lingering questions and explain why I can’t make sense of these COVID vaccines.
I don’t know everything, but so far no one has been able to answer the objections below. So here are the reasons I’m opting out of the COVID vaccine:
1. Vaccine makers are immune from liability
The only industry in the world that bears no liability for injuries or deaths resulting from their products are vaccine makers.
As first established in 1986 with the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, and reinforced by the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act, vaccine makers cannot be sued — even if they are shown to be negligent.
The COVID vaccine makers are allowed to create a one-size-fits-all product, with no testing on sub-populations (i.e. people with specific health conditions), and yet they are unwilling to accept any responsibility for any adverse events or deaths their products cause.
If a company is not willing to stand behind its product as safe, especially one rushed to market, I am not willing to take a chance on that product.
No liability. No trust. Here’s why …
2. The checkered past of vaccine companies
The four major companies who are making COVID vaccines are/have either:
- Never brought a vaccine to market before COVID (Moderna and Johnson & Johnson).
- Are serial felons (Pfizer, and AstraZeneca).
- Are both (Johnson & Johnson).
Moderna had been trying to “Modernize our RNA” (thus the company name) for years, but had never successfully brought any product to market. How nice for the company to get a major cash infusion from the government to keep trying.
In fact, all major vaccine makers (save Moderna) have paid out tens of billions of dollars in damages for other products they brought to market when they knew those products would cause injuries and death — see Vioxx, Bextra, Celebrex, Thalidomide and opioids as a few examples.
In this video several doctors are discussing all the unknown questions about the safety of the “vaccine” with a lawyer speaking at the end of the video regarding liability issues.
There has been a tremendous amount of speculation why discussion of both hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin were ridiculed and banned by the many government agencies and the media. (whenever I posted any article about hydroxychloroquine on facebook, it was immediately taken down – censorship).
In the video of Dr. Kory that was sent out this morning, it was noted that the NIH has finally determined that Ivermectin has been approved to be an effective treatment against Covid 19.
Below In blue, you will see the answer to the question as to why Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin had been demonized – It was all about getting emergency authorization to develop a “vaccine” because if there were viable treatments (hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin) that were effective against the virus, Big Pharma would not of been allowed to develop a vaccine.
If you listen to these doctors in this video they will explain why this really isn’t a vaccine. The developers called it a vaccine because according to law, Big Pharma cannot be sued for any damage their “vaccines” do. Absolutely criminal that so many people have needlessly died because hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin were ridiculed and banned and doctors were threatened for prescribing it to their patients. We always must remember to “follow the money” ! Nancy
The NIH timing is also interesting, isn’t it, because the FDA can’t issue Emergency Authorization for a “vaccine” if viable treatments are already available. But now that that’s done, boom, cheap and effective drug no longer banned.
COVID Vaccines, Mask, and Outpatient Care: Three Expert’s Perspectives 2/11/21
VIDEO
Evidently, You Tube did not like it that Dr. Kory testified that Ivermectin was an effective treatment for the Chinese Virus. Nancy
Google’s YouTube has ratcheted up censorship to a new level by removing two videos from a U.S. Senate committee. They were from a Dec. 8 Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs hearing on early treatment of Covid-19. One was a 30-minute summary; the other was the opening statement of critical-care specialist Pierre Kory.
Dr. Kory is part of a world-renowned group of physicians who developed a groundbreaking use of corticosteroids to treat hospitalized Covid patients. His testimony at a May Senate hearing helped doctors rethink treatment protocols and saved lives.
At the December hearing, he presented evidence regarding the use of ivermectin, a cheap and widely available drug that treats tropical diseases caused by parasites, for prevention and early treatment of Covid-19. He described a just-published study from Argentina in which about 800 health-care workers received ivermectin and 400 didn’t. Not one of the 800 contracted Covid-19; 58% of the 400 did.
