VIDEO – GLENN BECK – THE DARK SIDE OF USAID
Monday, February 3rd, 2025
Listen to this wow!!! Glenn Beck explains the evil of USAID:
BOMBSHELL: Under guise of foreign aid, USAID funding terror groups with taxpayer money – Glenn Beck
Listen to this wow!!! Glenn Beck explains the evil of USAID:
BOMBSHELL: Under guise of foreign aid, USAID funding terror groups with taxpayer money – Glenn Beck
VIDEO
August 1, 2024
Counterterrorism expert John Guandolo details the perplexing relationship between the US intelligence community and global terrorist sympathizers.
Link to full show: https://rumble.com/v59cot1-stop-the-steal-dinesh-dsouza-podcast-ep887.html?mref=23gga&mc=8uxj1
Link to John Guandolo’s report: https://img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/d14224be-c4dc-407d-abbe-854237830371/downloads/Hamas%20in%20America.pdf?ver=1722363272525
John Guandolo & Chris Gaubatz explain Islam through Sharia.
From UTT ‘Islam is Sharia’ (4)
Eps. 1 – Dar al-Harb & Dar al-Islam https://rumble.com/v2f09h6-utts-guandolo-and-gaubatz-dar-al-harb-vs.-dar-al-islam.html
Eps. 2 – ‘Reliance of the Traveller’ – Sharia Manual https://rumble.com/v2frq2w-147420104.html
Eps. 3 – Abrogation & Ijma https://rumble.com/v2h0ewg-utts-guandolo-and-gaubatz-abrogation-and-ijma.html
Eps. 4 – Islamic Apostasy https://rumble.com/v2ilu5a-152184286.html
Eps. 5 – Only One Jihad https://rumble.com/v2kotmo-155682816.html
Eps. 6 – Jihad Means Total War https://rumble.com/v2lfulk-156943784.html
Eps. 7 – Teaching Jihad https://rumble.com/v2lfulk-156943784.html
Eps. 8 – Only One Sharia https://rumble.com/v2lsthw-157548884.html
Eps. 9 – Only One Jihad and One Sharia https://rumble.com/v2mo6j8-159012116.html
Eps. 10 – Zakat – Founding the Jihad https://rumble.com/v2n6oz4-159875824.html
Eps. 11 – The Quranic Concept of War https://rumble.com/v2nv3w4-161014900.html
Eps. 12 – Dawah – The Call to Islam https://rumble.com/v2omyoa-162314506.html
Eps. 13 – Lying to Advance Islam https://rumble.com/v2sw2r2-utt-4.13.html
Eps. 14 – Mosque & State – The Inalienable Possession https://rumble.com/v2t9pus-utt.-4.14.html
Eps. 15 – Islamic honor-killings https://rumble.com/v2toqxu-utt-15.html
Eps. 16 – Slandering Islam https://rumble.com/v2tx7e8-utt-4.16.html
Eps. 17 – Islamic slander laws – Talebearing https://rumble.com/v2wsje1-utt-4.17.html
Eps. 18 – Islam controls the narrative https://rumble.com/v2wyvua-utt-4.18.html
Eps. 19 – The Hudud, Islamic criminal law and punishments https://rumble.com/v2xtlka-utt-4.19-hudud.html
Eps. 20 – Epilogue, from the Temple Mount https://rumble.com/v2y9zfs-utt-4.20.html
A television miniseries (both parts put together here for one main feature) on the events leading up to the U.S. terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001.
Peace, War, and Politics
A crucial distinction made in Islamic theology is that between Dar al-Harb and Dar al-Islam. What do these terms mean and how does it influence and affect Muslim nations and extremists? These are important questions to ask and understand given the turbulent world we live in today.
To put it simply, Dar al-Harb is understood as “territory of war or chaos.” This is the name for the regions where Islam does not dominate and where divine will is not observed. It is, therefore, where continuing strife is the norm.
By contrast, Dar al-Islam is a “territory of peace.” This is the name for those territories where Islam does dominate and where submission to God is observed. It is where peace and tranquility reign.
The distinction is not quite as simple as it may appear at first. For one thing, the division is regarded as legal rather than theological. Dar al-Harb is not separated from Dar al-Islam by things like the popularity of Islam or divine grace. Rather, it is separated by the nature of the governments which have control over a territory.
A Muslim-majority nation not ruled by Islamic law is still Dar al-Harb. A Muslim-minority nation ruled by Islamic law could qualify as being part of Dar al-Islam.
Wherever Muslims are in charge and enforce Islamic law, there is also Dar al-Islam. It doesn’t matter so much what people believe or have faith in, what matters is how people behave. Islam is a religion focused more upon proper conduct (orthopraxy) than on proper beliefs and faith (orthodoxy).
Islam is also a religion that has never had an ideological or theoretical place for a separation between the political and the religious spheres. In orthodox Islam, the two are fundamentally and necessarily linked. That’s why this division between Dar al-Harb and Dar al-Islam is defined by political control rather than religious popularity.
In a very candid interview with conservative Mark Levin on Sunday, the former commander of British troops in Afghanistan, Colonel Richard Kemp, said that President Joe Biden had single-handedly destroyed NATO’s credibility and had betrayed the United States and the U.S. military, for which he “should be court-martialed.”
“In my opinion, and I don’t say this lightly, and I’ve never said it about anybody else, any other leader in this position, people have been talking about impeaching President Biden,” said Col. Kemp on FNC’s Life, Liberty & Levin.
“I don’t believe President Biden should be impeached,” he added. “He’s the commander-in-chief of the U.S. Armed Forces, who’s just essentially surrendered to the Taliban. He shouldn’t be impeached; he should be court-martialed for betraying the United States of America and the United States Armed Forces.”
Colonel Kemp was an infantry battalion commanding officer and he headed Operation Fingal in Afghanistan in 2003. Kemp also served in the Iraq war, the Bosnian war, the Gulf war, and in battles against terrorists in Northern Ireland (Operation Banner). He was awarded the Commander of the Order of the British Empire and the Queen’s Commendation for Bravery.
During the Aug. 22 interview, Levin asked, “Colonel Kemp, my question to you is, given what has taken place now in Afghanistan, and it’s ongoing, and assuming that Joe Biden stays on the same course, what are consequences for the United States, Britain, NATO, the free world, and that area of the world now?”
Kemp replied, “I think the consequences of what has just happened and what’s still happening are absolutely devastating for the whole of the Western world. I mentioned earlier that the catastrophic effect on NATO. NATO is a very important military alliance.”
Osama bin Laden banned al Qaeda from assassinating Joe Biden because the Democrat would become an incompetent president and ‘lead the US into a crisis’ if jihadists were successful in killing Barack Obama.
Bin Laden made the remark in a 2010 letter that was found in a trove of documents at the Pakistan compound where he was killed by US special forces in 2011.
The document was first made public in 2012 but has been brought back to light and given new significance amid the chaotic US withdrawal from Afghanistan that has gifted the country back to the Taliban.
The Wall Street Journal hasn’t endorsed a presidential candidate since 1928—Hoover—and we aren’t about to change this year. But we do try to sum up the risks and promise of the candidates every four years, and we’ll start today with the contradictory candidacy of Joe Biden.
The former Vice President is running as a reassuring moderate, a man of good character who can reunite the country and crush Covid-19 after the disruptive Trump Presidency. Yet he also is running on the most left-wing policy program in decades.
Voters have little idea about these policies because Mr. Biden mentions them only in the most vague, general terms. The press barely reports them. Americans may think they’re voting for Joe’s persona, but they will get the platform of Kamala Harris, Nancy Pelosi, Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders.
In Mr. Biden’s sunny telling, he will be the anti-Donald Trump. He won’t kick down, won’t trash norms and won’t alienate allies. He’ll work with Republicans to forge bipartisan policies, restraining the passions of his party’s left. In that sense he has been the perfect Democratic nominee to appeal to women and suburban Republicans tired of polarized politics. He has run a disciplined campaign on character and Covid that has made the election a referendum on Mr. Trump.
We too would like to believe Mr. Biden could govern in a less divisive way because it would be better for the country. Left to his own instincts, and if he were a decade younger, he might pull it off. Every Republican who negotiated with the White House over a budget compromise in 2011 told us they made progress when Mr. Biden was in the room, only to have Barack Obama take it all back when he joined the talks.
But what evidence is there today that Mr. Biden will restrain his increasingly radical party? Across his long career he has been the consummate party man, floating right or left with the political tides. As a presidential candidate this year he has put no particular policy imprint on the Democratic Party—not one. The party has put its stamp on him.
Americans are, in my experience, the warmest, most kind-hearted and open-minded people in the world. I have found this to be true for my whole life, despite being the niece of Osama bin Laden and sharing the same last name (albeit spelled slightly differently — bin Ladin is the original translation). Americans base their judgment on the content of someone’s character and actions, not on the color of their skin — or their last name. This was reaffirmed last month, after I voiced my love for America and support for President Trump. The response to ‘My Letter to America’ has been overwhelmingly wonderful, and I am most thankful to all those who took the time to read it and send kind messages, including Spectator readers. But in my private life, I have lost a few so-called friends for backing Donald Trump over the past five years. Coming out publicly was a step too far for some, and the vitriol I received for stating my political beliefs revealed unflattering sides to certain characters. From a sociological standpoint, it is quite interesting that in some elitist circles being pro-Trump has caused me more grief than carrying the name bin Ladin.
Even more striking were the contrasting reactions to President Trump’s COVID diagnosis. Gleeful comments devoid of compassion flooded social media, some even going as far as to wish for his death. Kim Jong-un showed more sympathy than many of the President’s detractors. Yet for all the hate, there was an outpouring of love and well-wishes from his supporters. One take from a favorite Twitter account of mine (@HonorAndDaring) expressed it best: ‘Trump is the first and only President that I’ve actually cared about. That’s because he’s the first President in recent memory that seems to care more about Americans than an abstract ideology or just enriching his donors.’ This sentiment is clearly felt by many Americans, who come out in droves for the President wherever he goes, including Walter Reed Medical Center during his stay: if he can’t hit the road, the rally comes to him.
And why do I support Donald Trump? Look at his record. He has stood up to China, kept America out of new wars, solidified ties with Israel, overturned the disastrous Iran deal and obliterated Isis. Domestically, he removed handicapping regulations to American economic growth, rebuilt a depleted military, brought back manufacturing and revamped dying industries by renegotiating trade deals and cutting taxes; he has achieved energy independence, curbed immigration — all of which contributed to setting record unemployment rates. He has tackled neglected issues such as human trafficking and unjust incarceration — and given America a chance at restoring her principles, pride, independence and true place in the world as beacon of liberty and hope for all.