Archive for the ‘Politics’ Category


Wednesday, May 18th, 2022


The Great Reset-the Biggest Lie for Global Control

The Great Reset-the Biggest Lie for Global Control




Tuesday, May 17th, 2022

Subject: Michele Bachmann on WHO Amendments: “This creates a platform for global governance”



Tuesday, May 17th, 2022


Just out! 

This is the Dinish D’sousa’s film we’ve been waiting for.



Wednesday, May 11th, 2022


The Exasperated American

 Will the voters channel their furor at this regime of lies into an unprecedented turnout at the polls in
November ?
By Victor Davis Hanson   May 9, 2022

A large majority of Americans now have no confidence in Joe Biden and his administration, which often polls below 40 percent, with negatives nearing 60 percent.

Despite the 15-month catastrophe of his regime, the level of his own unpopularity remains understandable but still remarkable. After all, in 2020 voters already knew well of his cognitive deficits and the radicalism of his agenda. They saw both clearly starting in 2019 and during the 2020 Democratic primaries, the primary debates, and the general election.

So what did Biden’s voters imagine would happen when a cognitively challenged president, controlled by hard-Left subordinates, entered office—other than what he has done?



Wednesday, May 4th, 2022


Election Integrity Dead: Killed in Court

by J. Christian Adams
May 3, 2022    J. Christian Adams is President of the Public Interest Legal Foundation, the nation’s only public interest law firm dedicated wholly to election integrity. He served in the Voting Section of the United States Department of Justice and currently serves as a commissioner appointed by President Trump on the United States Commission on Civil Rights.

  • Many election operatives know that elections are won or lost because of process. For decades, one side has been focused on policy, big ideas, and winning debates. Meanwhile, the other side has been focused on process and the rules of the elections game.
  • [A] war is taking place around elections that has nothing to do with voting machines being controlled by Italian satellites or Internet hackers. They don’t need to be.
  • Election process fights have become a Darwinian “survival of the fittest.” Whichever side can effectively adapt to a new technological or cultural environment often determines who wins and who loses.
  • In 2020, an unprecedented burst of mail ballots swamped election offices because of the fright of COVID. All over the country, judges struck down or suspended laws that would have ensured those mail ballots were processed according to the law. At the same time, hundreds of millions of dollars in private money poured into election offices to change the way the elections were run.
  • It is a dangerous place we find ourselves, where citizens through the legislative process are enacting safeguards to keep our elections clean and manageable, yet a hyper-funded onslaught has mastered the art of killing real, verifiable, integrity in elections.
  • First, do not assume there will be a “red wave” this November. Many election operatives have demonstrated a fierce ability to adapt and leverage cultural and technological awareness into electoral wins.
  • Second, a “red wave” cannot overcome the “blue wave” tactics of 2020 seen in urban areas flush with outside cash.
  • Third, the Biden administration is already turning the battleship of the entire federal government toward turnout in 2022. Institutions have mobilized every single agency into a weapon to increase voter turnout among “historically marginalized communities.” Decoded, that means racial groups. This is all happening with little fanfare, and little means to stop it.
  • (more…)


Tuesday, May 3rd, 2022


Right to Treat
Physicians are being prevented from providing treatment to their patients by employers, public health agencies, pharmacies, and threats from medical boards leaving us unable in some situations to protect and serve patients facing disease. Many patients are being advised to go home until their disease worsens to the point of hospitalizations. We believe that prevention and early treatment measures are always the best courses of action. We defend the right to prescribe treatment and that physicians should not be restricted from prescribing safe and effective treatments that prevent unnecessary sickness and death. It is both usual and legal for medical providers to prescribe FDA approved medications for off-label prescription.

Informed Consent

As physicians it is our utmost responsibility to uphold and restore the value of informed consent and the doctor-patient relationship. Employers, government officials and more are coercing American citizens into medical interventions against their will in order to maintain employment, enrollment and more. Science has long taught us that every intervention poses risks and benefits and that the doctor-patient relationship should be preserved and each patient treated as an individual with unique predispositions. Each patient after being fully informed of the risks and benefits of any medical intervention should be able to choose or deny such intervention.

Respecting Opinions

As physicians, our 1st Amendment rights and professional individualized opinions are being censored and suppressed as we are prohibited to openly engage in professional discourse and the exchange of ideas that endangers our profession and patients rights. Discovering truth in medicine depends on a healthy discussion and dissenting opinions. If we lose the ability to have differing opinions then we lose the ability to determine the best possible solutions as well as the integrity, art and science of medicine.

Patient Rights and Medical Privacy

A growing number of bureaucrats and government officials are stepping into the area of personalized medical care. We believe that no employer or entity should demand to know one’s personal health information including but not limited to vaccine status, medical history, and medical exemptions. HIPAA rights should be maintained regardless of the current medical environment.


Monday, May 2nd, 2022


This is an excellent in-depth interview with Retired General Robert Spalding regarding  China.  Part 1 should also be viewed.

If you missed part one of this interview, you can find it here. 


April 30, 2022 
PART 2: Behind China’s Lockdown Madness—Gen. Robert Spalding on a Looming Taiwan Invasion, the Russia-Ukraine War
American Thought Leaders



“They’re going to go element by element through their economy and see which of those is still open to attack from the West … to seal those up prior to invading Taiwan.”

Previously, in part one of my interview with retired Brigadier General Robert Spalding, he broke down the Chinese regime’s strategy of unrestricted warfare, which is detailed in his latest book “War Without Rules: China’s Playbook for Global Domination.”

Now in part two, we discuss what’s really going on behind China’s new round of draconian lockdowns. Is it potentially related to Xi Jinping’s plans for Taiwan?

“The Chinese Communist Party doesn’t do things willy-nilly. It’s very deliberate,” Spalding says.

How can the United States effectively counter the Chinese communist threat to Taiwan and the rest of the free world?

If you missed part one of this interview, you can find it here. 





Saturday, April 30th, 2022


These left-wing political groups need to be exposed.  If left unchecked, these  groups will contaminate our elections that were meant to be free and fair.   Nancy 

Nonprofit Pushing Jan. 6 Ballot Disqualifications Is Funded, Led by Left-Wing Activists

By Mark Tapscott  April 27, 2022

Just minutes after Donald Trump was sworn in as president in January 2017, Free Speech for People (PFS), working with RootsAction, another obscure left-wing activist group, launched the website

The Trump impeachment website remains live today, but PFS has moved on from years of seeking to drive the embattled Trump from the Oval Office to now trying to remove four of his strongest congressional supporters from their respective November 2022 ballots.

Although officially a nonpartisan educational nonprofit, PFS’s most notable activities since being organized in the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United decision have all been directed at Trump and other Republicans.

Most recently, PFS made headlines with litigation it filed against four House Republicans and one Arizona Republican state representative seeking to have state courts remove the officials’ names from the November ballot.

An Arizona Superior Court judge rejected PFS’s request to remove U.S. Reps. Andy Biggs and Paul Gosar, both Arizona congressmen, and Arizona state Rep. Mark Finchem from the November ballot. The PFS lawsuit stated that the lawmakers’ alleged efforts in support of the January 2021 breach of the U.S. Capitol amounted to participation in an insurrection seeking to bring down the federal government.

Biggs and Gosar are seeking reelection to the U.S. House, while Finchem seeks to be elected as Arizona’s secretary of state.


Saturday, April 30th, 2022


This video  is the reason I  don’t trust Bill Barr.  To me it just doesn’t make political sense that down ballot Republicans would win big in the battleground states and the top of the ticket (Trump) would go down to defeat.  That just doesn’t happen as the top of the ticket has always provided the coattails for the down ballot wins.   It screams voter fraud against Trump !   Nancy   

WATCH: Lame Duck Bill Barr Stabs Trump in the Back, Once Again

On Thursday, former Attorney General Bill Barr appeared on Newsmax TV’s “Spicer & Co.” and declared that former President Donald Trump should not be GOP’s 2024 presidential nominee.

Barr began, “Maybe your audience doesn’t want to hear this, but Trump ran weaker than the Republican ticket in Arizona, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania — 75,000 Republicans went to the polls and voted straight Republican ticket in Arizona and didn’t vote for him, 60,000 in Wisconsin, 60,000 and Pennsylvania. That’s why he lost the election.”



Friday, April 29th, 2022


Martha Jenkins, one of our conservative ladies, recently wrote this excellent article regarding the Democrats’ push to pack the Supreme Court.  Nancy

JENKINS: Keep nine Supreme Court Justices

Public support for packing the Supreme Court is very low, yet progressives are mounting a campaign to add additional seats to skew the ideological balance of the court.  Most people, if they think of court packing at all, assume that the idea died with Franklin D. Roosevelt when his own Democrat party panned the idea as too drastic.  But recent rhetoric and published articles show that there is a movement afoot to expand the court as soon as progressives get enough votes in Congress.

There have been nine justices on the Supreme Court since 1869. Most people think the Constitution sets the number at nine. However, the Constitution grants Congress the authority to set the number of justices on the court, and bills were filed in both houses of Congress in 2021 to add four more seats.

Manipulating the court for partisan advantage is antithetical to the American system of checks and balances provided by an independent judicial branch.  The Supreme Court keeps both the Executive Branch and the Legislative Branch accountable to Constitutional principles.  One of the first things Hugo Chavez did when he took over Venezuela was to pack the Court so that it could not stop him from becoming a dictator.  Without an independent Supreme Court, there is nothing to check the balance of power, and no guarantee that states can hold the federal government to the Constitution.

During the 2020 campaign, Joe Biden said voters didn’t deserve to know where he stood on court packing.  Soon after his inauguration, President Biden appointed a commission to report on potential “reforms” to the Supreme Court.  This Commission sidestepped the court packing issue, although progressive groups like Demand Justice were vocal in criticizing the Commission for its lack of support for court packing.  The Commission’s report was essentially a ruse, intended to keep the issue of court packing in the background.

Public polling shows that the American public is very much against increasing the number of justices. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg said “Nine is a good number” and retiring Justice Breyer has also spoken against packing the court.  Several years ago, a bipartisan group of former state attorneys general ― including Rufus Edmisten from North Carolina ― proposed “The Keep Nine Amendment” which simply says “The Supreme Court of the United States shall be composed of nine justices.” 


Search All Posts