Here’s the Abstract: Agenda 21, a voluntary plan adopted at the 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, unabashedly calls on governments to intervene and regulate nearly every potential impact that human activity could have on the environment. However, Agenda 21 is non-binding; it depends on governments for implementation. If opponents focus excessively on Agenda 21, it is much more likely that homegrown smart-growth policies that undermine the quality of life, personal choice, and property rights in American communities will be implemented by local, state, and federal authorities at the behest of environmental groups and other vested interests. Preventing American implementation of Agenda 21 should therefore be viewed as only one part of a broader effort to convince U.S. government officials to repeal destructive smart-growth programs and prevent the enactment of new ones.

Read the rest of their article analysis at heritage.org.

This entry was posted on Friday, December 2nd, 2011 at 3:59 am and is filed under Agenda 21, Agriculture, American History, Big Government, Economy, England, Environmental Issues, Environmental Protection Agency-, Global Warming, Government Regulation, Heritage Foundation, Liberalism, Progressive Movement, Redistribution of Wealth, Social Justice, U.N.. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.