Archive for the ‘Keynesian Theory of Economics’ Category

VIDEO – OBAMA’S FIRST CAMPAIGN AD OF 2012

Tuesday, April 12th, 2011

Share

TIME FOR WAR AGAINST DEMOCRATS’ FISCAL SABOTAGE

Monday, March 28th, 2011

Time for War Against Democrats’ Fiscal Sabotage

Posted 03/13/2011 ET

It is amazing that the American people would continue to elect Democratic politicians to national office, considering Democrats’ cynical disregard for the federal budget crisis. They aren’t even slightly serious about becoming part of the solution.

Consider the Senate Democrats’ most recent proposal for budget cuts to avert a government shutdown. Senate Republicans, following the House plan, proposed $61 billion in cuts for the current year, while Senate Democrats proposed a paltry $6.5 billion. (The Congressional Budget Office says it’s actually only $4.7 billion.) Though Obama seems to be hiding in the bushes on this one, he is said to support the Democratic plan.

Did you hear that: $6.5/$4.7 billion? This is nothing. It’s an outrage. This from the clowns who say the Republican cuts, which themselves wouldn’t be enough, are “Draconian.” No, it’s their attitude that is Draconian — to the republic.

There’s no hope from the left side of the aisle when these people are irreversibly tied to the fiction that the economy simply can’t function without an ongoing federal spending explosion. And they always get their charlatan economists to enable their profligacy.

The fact that their reckless spending hasn’t worked as advertised doesn’t faze them. Never does it occur to them that the borrowed money they spend to “grow the economy” smothers private-sector spending and is necessarily less efficient and less capable of generating a multiplier effect than private-sector spending. Private-sector spending is actually driven by what people want and need rather than by what dictatorial federal politicians tell us we should want or need. (more…)

Share

DETROIT’S DECLINE AND THE FOLLY OF LIGHT RAIL

Sunday, March 27th, 2011
  • The Wall Street Journal
    • MARCH 25, 2011

    The country needs to unleash entrepreneurs, who will only be held back by tax-funded make-work projects.

    The Census just reported that Detroit’s population dropped by 25% between 2000 and 2010, a stunning fall that is even larger than the 20% drop Detroit experienced during the 1970s. The story of this city’s devastating decline reminds us that urban fortunes depend on entrepreneurial human capital. Failed public policies that tried to fix Detroit with urban renewal and transportation projects stand as stark evidence against the view that our economic woes call for more federal spending on infrastructure.

    The White House’s fondness for transportation spending may reflect the fact that projects like the Erie Canal had great value when moving goods was near impossible. In 1816, it cost as much to move goods 30 miles over land as it did to ship them across the Atlantic. Public investments in waterways and railroads created a transportation network that made the natural wealth of the American interior accessible.

    Cities like Detroit grew up as entrepreneurs came to the nodes of that network. Hiram Walker moved to Detroit from central Massachusetts in the 1830s and made his fortune shipping Canadian whiskey over the Detroit River. Detroit Dry Dock produced innovative engines and boats that plied the Great Lakes, and in the process, exposed the young Henry Ford to cutting-edge engineering.

    A century ago, Detroit was crammed with smart innovators who competed and collaborated in their quest to produce the newest thing. Ford, the Fisher Brothers, the Dodge Brothers, David Dunbar Buick and Billy Durant in nearby Flint were only a few of the automobile entrepreneurs who collectively invented the mass-produced car.

    Henry Ford in the T Ford model in front of his car plant in Detroit, in 1900.

    glaeser

    (more…)

    Share

    STEVE FORBES – REAGAN’S LEGACY AND THE CURRENT MALAISE

    Thursday, March 24th, 2011
    The Wall Street Journal

    • MARCH 22, 2011

    Lower taxes and a strong dollar could spur growth once again.

    Today, the Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation, the Manhattan Institute and The Wall Street Journal will host a morning seminar concerning the economic legacy of Ronald Reagan. The get-together couldn’t be timelier.

    Reagan came into the White House facing an economy as troubled as ours—one that had even higher unemployment, catastrophic interest rates (18% for mortgages) and a stock market that in real terms had fallen 60% from its mid-1960s levels. When he left office eight years later, the U.S. had become an economic miracle: 18 million new jobs had been created; Silicon Valley had blossomed, becoming a global symbol for innovation; and the stock market was experiencing a bull run that, despite dramatic ups and downs, didn’t end until the turn of the 21st century, after the Dow had expanded 15-fold. The expansion of the U.S. economy exceeded the entire size of West Germany’s economy, then the world’s third-largest.

    How did this happen? You could make the case that Reagan’s economic miracle had its origins at a Washington, D.C., restaurant in 1974. That December night, 34-year-old University of Chicago professor, Art Laffer, scribbled a single—and now legendary—curve on a cocktail napkin to illustrate to a group of President Ford’s advisers why a proposed plan to raise taxes would not increase government revenues. Mr. Laffer posited that deep cuts in existing tax rates would stimulate the economy and ultimately lead to far higher government revenues. Conversely, increase the tax burden and government receipts would fall below expectations because of a weaker economy. (more…)

    Share

    IT’S A STRATEGY, NOT A CONSPIRACY

    Friday, February 25th, 2011

    REDSTATE.COM

    The Obama Administration’s energy policy is not evil, it’s just wrong, wrong, wrong.

    Posted by Steve Maley (Profile)

    Thursday, February 24th As “Vladimir”, I’ve written at length about the destructive energy policies of the Left and of the Obama Administration. Specifically, their hostility toward domestic producers and the producing states will inevitably lead to higher unemployment and a stagnant economy in the near term; long term, they imperil our national security.

    What could possibly motivate them?

    Some say that Obama is merely the puppet of an evil conspiracy which is bent on our destruction.

    Others say that Obama thinks he is acting in the country’s best interest, but that his perspective is limited and his worldview is skewed.

    It is important for us to act as if it is the latter, and here’s why.

    If we act as if we believe that world events are under the control of evil masterminds (whether it be the Illuminati, Zionists, the Trilateral Commission or George Soros), we do three things: 1) we invest the opposition with unassailable power; 2) we confine ourselves to a fringe movement; and, perhaps most significantly, 3) we excuse our own inaction, because, after all, we’re powerless.

    Occam’s razor dictates that the simplest explanation is usually the best one. If you have to connect too many dots, chances are you’re connecting them wrong. That’s where conspiracy theories usually fall apart.

    We don’t need to figure out who Obama’s puppet master is, or if he has one. He has told us his strategy, and he is carrying it out. (more…)

    Share

    VIDEO – STEVE FORBES AT HILLSDALE COLLEGE SPEAKING ON THE GREAT SOCIETY AND CURRENT ECONOMIC CONTROVERSIES

    Friday, February 4th, 2011
    Share

    THE GREEDY BASTARDS PARADOX

    Tuesday, February 1st, 2011

    January 31, 2011

    The Greedy Bastards Paradox

    Bogie

    If we accept President Obama’s economic arguments, his State of the Union address was most remarkable in the aftermath, when nothing happened.

    For the sake of argument, let’s agree with the President that the winning ticket of the global economic lottery will be investment in renewable energy, high-speed rail and other green industries.  Bet on green and you win the future.  Let’s also stipulate, as the left believes, that private capital in America is in the hands of greedy bastards — capitalists who will do anything for a buck.

    The question then becomes why all those greedy bastards are not pouring money into the epochal investment opportunity that President Obama unveiled.  Why is Wall Street not running up the stocks of companies positioned to flourish in the coming green economy?  Where are the private equity firms that should be knocking down the doors of the solar shingle company that the President touted?  Why aren’t hedge fund sharpies jumping into high-speed rail?  After all, if Warren Buffet or John Paulson delivered a speech that laid out the way to win the future, every other greedy bastard would be shoveling money into their ideas before the applause was over.

    This is the greedy bastard paradox inherent in all government “investments.”  The state is left to fund the industrial policies of old or today’s green schemes precisely because they are uneconomic.  Economically viable investments need no government support because the greedy bastards of the private economy are already funding them. (more…)
    Share

    THE ROCHE RECORD – CAN WE GET SERIOUS PLEASE, OUR GREAT COUNTRY IS AT RISK

    Monday, January 31st, 2011

    CAN WE GET SERIOUS PLEASE, OUR GREAT COUNTRY IS AT RISK

    by Frank Roche, Economist

    Throughout American history, in good times and bad, policy makers have always faced difficult challenges, choices, and final decisions.  American policy makers in 2011 face their own difficult challenges, choices, and final decisions.  What I sense is missing today among policy makers is a sufficient degree of seriousness, a sufficient degree of urgency.

    If for example you’re one who is interested in America remaining the superpower, interested in America remaining a constitutional republic, interested in America maintaining a very high standard of living, interested in America being the home of the brave and the free, then the list of challenges confronting America is long and complex.  Taking on these challenges requires serious people working seriously.  Do you sense that among policy makers today?

    One only has to look at how DC is handling our massive deficit and debt, China, and uprising in the Middle East to get a sense we are lacking serious leadership dedicated to assuring America’s greatness.
    (more…)

    Share

    OBAMA’S ‘INVESTMENT’ CHARADE

    Friday, January 28th, 2011

    WALL STREET JOURNAL

    JANUARY 27, 2011

    Milton Friedman warned that government spending cancels out higher-return private investment.

    By STEPHEN MOORE
    Words matter in politics, which is why the federal government no longer “spends” (and wastes) money, but rather “invests” it. According to Barack Obama’s State of the Union address, nearly every penny of the $2.5 trillion domestic budget—for installing solar paneling on the roofs of libraries, funding lavish teacher retirement funds, building high-speed rail lines to nowhere, erecting billboards advertising the stimulus plan—is a high-return “investment” in America’s future.

    This is all spin. It’s a variation on the theme that brought us the $814 billion stimulus two years ago. That spending—er, investment—was going to create three million jobs. Those jobs never showed up.

    As part of the counterattack against Republican plans to cut $100 billion out of the domestic budget, the White House claims that America has been under-investing in infrastructure, education, science, research, transportation, environmental protection, green energy and so on. But if you examine the actual funding record of these programs, you see that there’s been no spending drought. There’s been a deluge. (more…)

    Share

    VIDEO INTERVIEW WITH MITT ROMNEY – PART 2

    Thursday, January 27th, 2011

    Share
    Search All Posts
    Categories