Archive for the ‘FDA’ Category

ESSENTIAL FACTS RE COVID

Monday, April 19th, 2021

 

2 excellent in depth articles     Nancy

www.justfacts.com/news_covid-19_essential_facts

Essential Facts About Covid-19

By James D. Agresti
December 10, 2020
Updated 4/16/21

Facemasks in the COVID-19 era: A health hypothesis

Share

CONCERNS ABOUT THE COVID VACCINE

Sunday, April 18th, 2021

 

Quite a few of us are questioning the long term safety of the covid vaccine.  This article goes into detail of the many concerns around the vaccine.    Nancy 

18 Reasons I Won’t Be Getting a COVID Vaccine

“I’m not here to pick a fight with anyone, just to walk you through some of what I’ve read, my lingering questions and explain why I can’t make sense of these COVID vaccines.”

By Christian Elliot – The Defender –  Christian Elliot is a certified personal trainer, life coach and a certified nutrition coach

A few friends have asked my thoughts on the COVID jab(s) so I thought it was time to write an article on the topic.

Knowing how contentious this issue is, part of me would rather just write about something else. But I believe the discussion/news is so one-sided that I should speak up.

As I always strive to do, I promise to do my best to be level-headed and non-hysterical.

I’m not here to pick a fight with anyone, just to walk you through some of what I’ve read, my lingering questions and explain why I can’t make sense of these COVID vaccines.

I don’t know everything, but so far no one has been able to answer the objections below. So here are the reasons I’m opting out of the COVID vaccine:

1. Vaccine makers are immune from liability

The only industry in the world that bears no liability for injuries or deaths resulting from their products are vaccine makers.

As first established in 1986 with the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, and reinforced by the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act, vaccine makers cannot be sued — even if they are shown to be negligent.

The COVID vaccine makers are allowed to create a one-size-fits-all product, with no testing on sub-populations (i.e. people with specific health conditions), and yet they are unwilling to accept any responsibility for any adverse events or deaths their products cause.

If a company is not willing to stand behind its product as safe, especially one rushed to market, I am not willing to take a chance on that product.

No liability. No trust. Here’s why …

2. The checkered past of vaccine companies

The four major companies who are making COVID vaccines are/have either:

Moderna had been trying to “Modernize our RNA” (thus the company name) for years, but had never successfully brought any product to market. How nice for the company to get a major cash infusion from the government to keep trying.

In fact, all major vaccine makers (save Moderna) have paid out tens of billions of dollars in damages for other products they brought to market when they knew those products would cause injuries and death — see VioxxBextraCelebrexThalidomide and opioids as a few examples.

(more…)

Share

VIDEO – DOCTOR EXPOSES EXPERIMENTAL GENE THERAPY

Friday, March 19th, 2021

 

 VIDEO

Subject: Dr Steven Hotze, M.D., Exposes Experimental Gene Therapy

Share

VIDEO – BILL GATES – FRIEND OR FOE ?

Wednesday, February 24th, 2021

 

VIDEO   BILL GATES 
>
Share

VIDEO – THREE DOCTORS DISCUSSING SAFETY OF VACCINES AND COVID

Friday, February 12th, 2021

In this video several doctors  are discussing all the unknown questions about the  safety of the “vaccine” with a lawyer speaking at the end of the video  regarding liability issues. 

 There has been a tremendous amount of speculation why discussion of both hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin were  ridiculed and banned by the many government agencies and the media.   (whenever I posted any article about hydroxychloroquine on facebook, it was immediately taken down – censorship). 

In the video of Dr. Kory that was sent out this morning, it was noted that the NIH has finally determined that Ivermectin has been approved to be an effective treatment  against Covid 19.      

 Below In blue, you will see the answer to the question as to why Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin had been demonized – It was all about getting  emergency authorization to develop a “vaccine”  because if there were viable treatments (hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin)  that were effective against the virus, Big Pharma would not of been allowed to develop a vaccine. 

If you listen to these doctors in this video they will explain why this really isn’t a vaccine.  The developers called it a vaccine because according to law, Big Pharma cannot be sued for any damage their “vaccines” do.  Absolutely criminal that so many people have needlessly died because hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin  were ridiculed and banned and doctors were threatened for prescribing it to their patients.   We always must  remember to “follow the money”  ! Nancy

The NIH timing is also interesting, isn’t it, because the FDA can’t issue Emergency Authorization for a “vaccine” if viable treatments are already available. But now that that’s done, boom, cheap and effective drug no longer banned.


COVID Vaccines, Mask, and Outpatient Care: Three Expert’s Perspectives 2/11/21

 VIDEO    
Share

VIDEO DR KORY BEFORE A SENATE LATEST HEARING RE IVERMECTIN AS A TREATMENT FOR COVID

Friday, February 12th, 2021

 


ARTICLE AND VIDEO    DR. KORY BEFORE A SENATE HEARING CHAIRED BY SENATOR RON JOHNSON REGARDING IVERMECTIN FOR THE TREATMENT OF COVID   FEBRUARY 4 , 2021

 

FROM THE ARTICLE – THE REAL REASON INFORMATION RE IVERMECTIN AND HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE WAS SUPPRESSED – The NIH timing is also interesting, isn’t it, because the FDA can’t issue Emergency Authorization for a “vaccine” if viable treatments are already available. But now that that’s done, boom, cheap and effective drug no longer banned.
Share

YOU TUBE CENSORS U.S. SENATE COVID HEARING

Thursday, February 4th, 2021

Evidently, You Tube did not like it that Dr. Kory testified that Ivermectin was an effective treatment for the Chinese Virus.   Nancy

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

YouTube Cancels the U.S. Senate

It censors testimony from physicians on early treatments for Covid-19 patients.

by Senator Ron Johnson    February 2, 2021

Google’s YouTube has ratcheted up censorship to a new level by removing two videos from a U.S. Senate committee. They were from a Dec. 8 Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs hearing on early treatment of Covid-19. One was a 30-minute summary; the other was the opening statement of critical-care specialist Pierre Kory.

Dr. Kory is part of a world-renowned group of physicians who developed a groundbreaking use of corticosteroids to treat hospitalized Covid patients. His testimony at a May Senate hearing helped doctors rethink treatment protocols and saved lives.

At the December hearing, he presented evidence regarding the use of ivermectin, a cheap and widely available drug that treats tropical diseases caused by parasites, for prevention and early treatment of Covid-19. He described a just-published study from Argentina in which about 800 health-care workers received ivermectin and 400 didn’t. Not one of the 800 contracted Covid-19; 58% of the 400 did.

(more…)

Share

VIDEO – THE NEW NORMAL

Tuesday, February 2nd, 2021

 

Frightening is definitely the word to describe what this video discuses regarding what the future holds regarding  Artificial Intelligence, Covid, the exploding power of  China, and the Global Reset.     Nancy   

‘THE NEW NORMAL’ DOCUMENTARY

Amazing but frightening documentary that investigates The Fourth Industrial Revolution, what the 1% has to gain and the rest of us are about to lose.

The filmmakers have a website happen.network. They hosted the documentary on Vimeo (another censoring platform) but it has been taken down.

 
Share

BIG CHUNK OF THE FIRST TAXPAYER CORONAVIRUS AID COULD BE SPENT OVERSEAS

Tuesday, March 24th, 2020

 

 We should be forgiven if our eyes glaze over as we read the enormous expense  of all  this.   Nancy

Big chunk of the first taxpayer coronavirus aid could be spent overseas

As much as $1 in every $4 from the first $8.3 billion aid package approved by Congress could be spent overseas or on foreign affairs.

Last Updated:
March 23, 2020 – 9:52pm

 

The short answer is … a good bit may end up overseas.

The title of the first legislation was the Coronavirus Preparedness and Response Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2020. President Trump signed it into law on March 6 after a bipartisan vote of Congress. The law appropriated $8.3 billion in initial response monies.

To put that into perspective, the first COVID-19 legislation exceeds the $1.1 billion appropriated for Zika in 2016, the $5.4 billion for Ebola in 2014, and the $7 billion for swine flu in 2009.

As much as $2.3 billion of the first $8.3 billion in funding falls into the categories of foreign aid, foreign affairs or overseas disease surveillance. Here’s how some of that breaks down:

  • $435 million for the U.S. Agency for International Development’s Global Health Programs.
  • $300 million for “international disaster assistance.”
  • $300 million for global disease detection and emergency response under the Centers for Disease Control
  • $200 million more goes to the State Department Foreign Operations Emergency Reserve Fund ·
  • $264 million for State Department Foreign Affairs for diplomatic response and evacuation over the next two and a half years.
  • $836 million for the U.S. or global response under the National Institutes of Health.

Here are some other major categories where the monies can be spent under the law:

(more…)

Share

GOOGLE AMASSES PERSONAL MEDICAL RECORDS

Tuesday, November 12th, 2019

 

This should be a concern to all of us.  If you think what you are telling your doctor is personal and private, think again !!!  Nancy
THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

Google Amasses Personal Medical Records

Company teams up with one of the U.S.’s largest health systems in ‘Project Nightingale’

BY ROB COPELAND   November 12, 2019

Google is engaged with one of the U.S.’s largest health-care systems on a project to collect and crunch the detailed personal- health information of millions of people across 21 states.

The initiative, code-named “Project Nightingale,” appears to be the biggest effort yet by a Silicon Valley giant to gain a toehold in the health-care industry through the handling of patients’ medical data. Amazon. com Inc., Apple Inc. and Microsoft Corp. are also aggressively pushing into health care, though they haven’t yet struck deals of this scope.

Google began Project Nightingale in secret last year with St. Louis-based Ascension, a Catholic chain of 2,600 hospitals, doctors’ offices and other facilities, with the data sharing accelerating since summer, according to internal documents.

The data involved in the initiative encompasses lab results, doctor diagnoses and hospitalization records, among other categories, and amounts to a complete health history, including patient names and dates of birth.

Neither patients nor doctors have been notified. At least 150 Google employees already have access to much of the data on tens of millions of patients, according to a person familiar with the matter and

the documents.

In a news release issued after The Wall Street Journal reported on Project Nightingale on Monday, the companies said the initiative is compliant with federal health law and includes robust protections for patient data.

Some Ascension employees have raised questions about the way the data is being collected and shared, both from a technological and ethical perspective, according to the people familiar with the project. But privacy experts said it appeared to be permissible under federal law. That law, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, generally allows hospitals to share data with business partners without telling patients, as long as the information is used “only to help the covered entity carry out its health care functions.”

(more…)

Share
Search All Posts
Categories