Archive for the ‘George W. Bush’ Category
Thursday, December 31st, 2020
Pour a glass of wine or your favorite calming drink and listen to this. Nancy
www.thrivetimeshow.com/business-podcasts/fireside-chat-with-lin-wood-episode-3/
FIRESIDE CHAT WITH LIN WOOD- EPISODE 3 | SHINING A LIGHT ON THE TRUTH ABOUT CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS, JOE BIDEN, OBAMA, THE clINTONS, BILL GATES, MIKE PENCE,& MORE
Posted in Administrative State, American History, Anti-Capitalists, Antifa, Asia, Big Business, Big Government, Censoring, China, CIA, Clinton, Cloward-Piven, Congress, Conservatism, Constitution, Coronavirus, Corporate Cronyism, Corruption/Crime, Cyber Security, Cyber Warfare, Deep State, Democracy, Democrats, Dept of Defense, Dictators, Dominion Voting Machines, Donald Trump, Dr Fauci, Election, Election 2016, Election 2018, Election 2020, FBI, FBI Director, Foreign Policy, George Soros, George W. Bush, Georgia, Globalists, GOP, Government Regulation, Government Waste and Fraud, History, Human Rights, Hunter Biden, Industrial Espionage, Intelligence, Joe Biden, Judges, Justice Department, Kamala Harris, Know Thy Enemy, Legal Issues, Liberalism, Marxism, Media, Melania Trump, Mike Pence, National Defense, Nationalism, Obama, Obama Administraiton and Policy, Patriotic, Pelosi, Political Corruption, Politics, Progressive Movement, Protestors, Racism, Radical Left, Regulations, Religion, Resistance, Rudy Giuliani, Sidney Powell, Soros, Sovereignty, Spain, Technology, Totalitarian, Transparency, Trump Cabinet Members, Tyranny, U.S. Presidents, Ukraine, Videos, Voter Fraud, Wall Street, Wokeness, Women's Issues | No Comments »
Thursday, November 12th, 2020
This article from a speech given at Hillsdale College, is packed with a tremendous amount of very important information about China. I have highlighted what I thought were the important facts for those of you who only have time to skim the article as it is a long article. The title of this article ‘Facing Up to the China Threat’ is definitely what we, as a country, needs to do to ensure our survival as a free nation. Nancy
IMPRIMIS
Facing Up to the China Threat
Septembe 2020
Brian T. Kennedy
American Strategy Group
Brian T. Kennedy is president of the American Strategy Group, chairman of the Committee for the Present Danger: China, and a board member and senior fellow of the Claremont Institute, where he served as president from 2002 to 2015. He has written widely on national security affairs and public policy, including in The Wall Street Journal, National Review, Investor’s Business Daily, and RealClearPolitics. He is the author of Communist China’s War Inside America.
The following is adapted from a speech delivered on September 29, 2020, in Rapid City, South Dakota, at a Hillsdale College National Leadership Seminar.
We are at risk of losing a war today because too few of us know that we are engaged with an enemy, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), that means to destroy us. The forces of globalism that have dominated our government (until recently) and our media for the better part of half a century have blinded too many Americans to the threat we face. If we do not wake up to the danger soon, we will find ourselves helpless.
That is a worst-case scenario. I do not think we Americans will let that happen. But the forces arrayed against us are many. We need to understand what we are up against and what steps must be taken to ensure our victory.
Our modern understanding of Communist China begins during the Cold War, with President Nixon’s strategic belief that China could serve as a counterweight to the Soviet Union. This belief seemed to carry with it two great benefits. First, the U.S. wouldn’t have to take on the Soviet Union by itself: Communist China was a populous country that bordered the Soviet Union and shared our interest, or so we thought, in checking its global ambitions. Second, by engaging with China—especially in terms of trade, but also by helping it develop technologically—we would help to end communism as a guiding force in China. This second notion might be called the China dream: economic liberalism would lead to political liberalism, and China’s communist dictatorship would fade away.
At the end of the Cold War, pursuing the China dream appeared a safe course of action, given that the U.S. was then the world’s preeminent military power. The 9/11 Islamic terrorist attacks reinforced the notion that superpower conflict was a thing of the past—that our major enemy was now radical Islam, widely diffused but centered in the Middle East. Later that same year, China was granted “Most Favored Nation” trading status and membership in the World Trade Organization. Little changed when the Bush administration gave way to the Obama administration. The latter’s “pivot to Asia” was mostly rhetorical—a justification to degrade our military capabilities vis-à-vis China, integrate even further the U.S. and Chinese economies, and prioritize the Middle East above all else.
Under both administrations, the U.S. failed to build a military that could challenge Communist China’s aggression in the Pacific—specifically its building of a modern navy and its construction of military installations on artificial islands in the South China Sea—and acquiesced in the export of much of the U.S. manufacturing base to China and elsewhere.
History will record that America’s China policy from the 1970s until recently was very costly because it involved a great deal of self-deception about the nature of the Chinese regime and the men who were running it.
Communist China Today
(more…)
Posted in Abortion, American History, Asia, Big Business, Black Lives Matter, Center For Disease Control, Center For Disease Control - CDC, China, Coronavirus, Corporate Cronyism, Council of Foreign Relations, Cyber Security, Cyber Warfare, Deep State, Defense Budget, Dept of Defense, Donald Trump, Dr Fauci, Education, Election 2020, Foreign Policy, Free Trade, George W. Bush, Globalists, Globalization, Industrial Espionage, Industry, Intelligence, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Liberalism, Medical/Drugs, Military, Missle Defense, National Defense, Nationalism, Nuclear Energy/Weapons, Obama, Obama Administraiton and Policy, Religion, Russia, Russian Reset, State Department, Technology, Totalitarian, Trade Agreements, Transparency, Wall Street | No Comments »
Wednesday, November 11th, 2020
Click on the link to view the list of Republicans who oppose the Donald Trump 2020 presidential campaign. Remember who these people are as they are elitists who have complete disregard for the vote of us supposedly “common people” ! Nancy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
List of Republicans who oppose the Donald Trump 2020 presidential campaign
This is a list of Republicans and conservatives who oppose the re-election of incumbent Donald Trump, the 2020 Republican Party nominee for President of the United States. Among them are former Republicans who left the party in 2016 or later due to their opposition to Trump, those who held office as a Republican, Republicans who endorsed a different candidate, and Republican presidential primary election candidates that announced opposition to Trump as the presumptive nominee. Over 70 former senior Republican national security officials and 60 additional senior officials have also signed on to a statement declaring, “We are profoundly concerned about our nation’s security and standing in the world under the leadership of Donald Trump. The President has demonstrated that he is dangerously unfit to serve another term.”[1]
A group of former senior U.S. government officials and conservatives—including from the Reagan, Bush 41, Bush 43, and Trump administrations have formed The Republican Political Alliance for Integrity and Reform (REPAIR) to, “focus on a return to principles-based governing in the post-Trump era.”[2]
A third group of Republicans, Republican Voters Against Trump was launched in May 2020 has collected over 500 testimonials opposing Donald Trump.[3]
Posted in Administrative State, Big Business, Big Government, Conservatism, Deep State, Dept of Defense, Donald Trump, Election 2020, Elitism, Foreign Policy, George W. Bush, Globalists, GOP, Justice Department, McMaster, Mitt Romney, Political Corruption, Politics, Populism, Representative Paul Ryan (R), Rex Tillerson, State Department, Transparency, Trump Cabinet Members, Wall Street | No Comments »
Tuesday, September 29th, 2020
Liberal warnings about Trump’s Middle East policy have proven embarrassingly wrong
| September 18, 2020
President Trump took a dramatically different approach to the Middle East than his predecessor, and at every step, former Obama-Biden foreign policy officials and their allies repeatedly warned of catastrophic results. Yet not only have the dire warnings failed to pass, but there have been historic breakthroughs for peace in the region.
The Democratic Alliance Initiative, a new conservative foreign policy group, has published a report looking at several high-profile decisions Trump has made and examining statements made at the time by former Obama-Biden officials, ambassadors, and think tank experts. The results are not pretty.
When Trump made the correct decision to withdraw from the disastrous Iran deal, Joe Cirincione, president of the Ploughshares Fund (a key outside supporter of the deal), predicted, “We are truly on a path toward war in the Middle East.” Colin Kahl, who was Joe Biden’s national security adviser when he was vice president, declared that “war drums” were “already sounding.”
When Trump ordered the killing of Iranian terrorist mastermind Qassem Soleimani, it was also supposed to bring war. Sen. Tim Kaine, the 2016 Democratic vice presidential candidate, claimed the killing “has brought us to the brink of another war in the Middle East.” Sen. Chris Murphy said that Trump may have set off a “potential massive regional war.” And Susan Rice, the former National Security Council adviser to Barack Obama rumored to have been on Biden’s shortlist for running mate, predicted a series of escalations, concluding, “It’s hard to envision how this ends short of war.”
The bombastic declarations also extended to Trump’s actions in support of Israel.
(more…)
Posted in Anti Semitism, Council of Foreign Relations, Deep State, Democrats, Dept of Defense, Donald Trump, Election 2020, Foreign Policy, George W. Bush, Hillary Clinton, Intelligence, Iran Nuclear Deal, Israel, Israeli Prime Minister, Jihad, Liberalism, Media, Middle East, Military, National Defense, Nationalism, Obama, Obama Administraiton and Policy, Progressive Movement, Radical Islam, Radical Left, Resistance, Terrorism | No Comments »
Saturday, January 4th, 2020
GUEST EDITORIALS
- Published: 01 October 2019
- Written by James D. Veltmeyer, MD
EDITORIAL – The ongoing attacks by the political establishment on President Donald Trump –which began even before he was elected – are without parallel in history. The savagery, frenzy, and outright hysteria displayed by the President’s enemies within the Democrat Party, the media, and the various power centers of the globalist elites have no prior precedent.
This President has been spied on, lied about, made the subject of phony foreign dossiers, insulted, ridiculed, scorned, mocked and threatened. We have witnessed Hollyweird celebrities advocate for blowing up the White House, demand the President be beaten, jailed or even assassinated, and his children tortured and sexually abused.
We have seen politicians in Washington try to convict the President of non-existent crimes, investigate him and his family members for everything from tax returns to guests at his hotels, project on to him crimes that they themselves have committed, and seed his Administration with leakers and double-agents.
No other President in American history has been treated in such a shameful manner. Not Lincoln. Not FDR. Not Nixon. Not Reagan.
What is it about this President that has roused such demons in his political foes? What is it about this President that drives his opponents to the brink of insanity? What is it about this President that so terrifies and terrorizes the Pelosis, Schiffs, Schumers and the George Soroses?
Is it simply that he is not part of the club, a brash outsider with a different style? Is it merely because he’s outspoken and tramples on political correctness? Is it because he’s sometimes unpresidential in his demeanor ( at least in their minds )?
Not at all. After all, aren’t these the same folks who loved Bill Clinton whose extracurricular activities involved cigars and staining blue dresses in the Oval Office?
(more…)
Posted in Administrative State, American History, Big Business, Big Government, Border Security, Brexit, China, Chuck Schumer, Clinton, Conservatism, Corporate Cronyism, Corruption/Crime, Deep State, Democrats, Donald Trump, Election 2020, Elitism, England, EU ( European Union), Europe, FBI Director, Foreign Policy, George Soros, George W. Bush, Global Warming, Globalists, Globalization, History, Illegal Immigration, James Comey, Liberalism, Migration - Islamic, National Defense, Nationalism, Obama, Obama Administraiton and Policy, One World Government, Open Borders, Political Corruption, Progressive Movement, Radical Left, Resistance, Socialism, Soros, Sovereignty, Trade Agreements, U.S. Presidents, USMCA | No Comments »
Monday, November 18th, 2019
End the War on Trump, Abolish the National Security Council
We can have free elections or the NSC.
Thu Nov 14, 2019
Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical Left and Islamic terrorism
Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, the latest star of the Democrat effort to undo the 2016 election, is still at work on the National Security Council. While Trump supporters on the NSC like Rich Higgins and Ezra Cohen-Watnick were forced out, Vindman won’t be. NSC staffers who criticized Obama holdovers or sought to expose their misbehavior are gone, but Vindman is still there while undermining Trump.
And that’s the SNAFU of things on the NSC.
The National Security Council has been ground zero in the campaign against President Trump from the beginning. General Flynn’s appointment as National Security Advisor had touched the third rail because the NSC had been used to coordinate anti-Trump operations in the Susan Rice era.
The NSC doesn’t answer to Congress. Its members are meant to advise the president. (Except when they’re actually working for a previous president.) They command the implements of foreign policy, traditionally the weakest element in domestic politics, but not when they start treating their domestic political opponents as agents of a foreign state. And the size of the NSC has gotten out of control.
Under Obama, the NSC staff hit 400 people. That’s up from a dozen during its Cold War origins.
And it’s the staff that’s the problem.
(more…)
Posted in Administrative State, American History, Big Government, Clinton, Congress, Daniel Greenfield, Deep State, Democrats, Dept of Defense, Donald Trump, Foreign Policy, George W. Bush, Intelligence, Liberalism, Military, National Defense, National Security Advisor, Obama, Obama Administraiton and Policy, Progressive Movement, Radical Left, Resistance, State Department, Transparency, Tyranny | No Comments »
Thursday, October 24th, 2019
This is the first article that I have read on the influential Council of Foreign Relations which is promoting a bigger role for government with increased immigration. Nancy
THE NEW AMERICAN
Wednesday, 23 October 2019
CFR: U.S. Needs More Mass Migration, Bigger Welfare State
Written by Alex Newman
Under the guise of keeping America “competitive” in the looming high-tech future, the globalist Council on Foreign Relations is urging policymakers at all levels to dramatically expand the size and scope of government. The bloated welfare states in Sweden and Denmark are cited as examples of the “advantages” of massive government programs to take care for people. Without the sort of fundamental transformation of America envisioned by the CFR, the nation will supposedly be left behind in the emerging new paradigm, the organization claimed. Critics, though, blasted that idea.
In its new report, dubbed “The Work Ahead: Machines, Skills, and U.S. Leadership in the Twenty-First Century,” the CFR Task Force offered a broad array of policy recommendations for federal, state, and local officials. These range from ever more immigration and a greater role for government in various facets of the economy, to a dramatic expansion of the welfare state modeled on Big Government schemes from Northern Europe. The CFR’s demands regarding education, which are a key component of the report, will be covered in an upcoming article.
Some of the leaders involved in creating the CFR report told The New American that without implementing the sought-after changes, America would be left behind as the world moves toward a globalized future of fast-moving technological progress. But experts and legislators invited to participate in the scheme who spoke to The New American sounded the alarm about the CFR’s vision. Among other concerns, they warned that the controversial CFR report and outreach efforts selling it to policymakers reveal a hidden plan to push a dangerous agenda and bring state and local officials into the establishment’s globalist orbit.
One reason why the CFR’s pronouncements are so important is because of the key role they play setting policy. Indeed, looking at its membership and influence, many analysts consider the CFR to be a key Deep State hub in America. The late U.S. Admiral Chester Ward, a CFR member for almost 20 years before defecting and blowing the whistle, explained that this enormous power is used for neferious purposes. In fact, Ward said, the main objective of the organization is to undermine U.S. sovereignty and facilitate the merger of the United States into what he described as an “all-powerful one-world government.”
The way it advances its objectives was explained by Admiral Ward, too. “Once the ruling members of CFR have decided that the U.S. Government should adopt a particular policy, the very substantial research facilities of CFR are put to work to develop arguments, intellectual and emotional, to support the new policy, and to confound and discredit, intellectually and politically, any opposition,” he said. “The most articulate theoreticians and ideologists prepare related articles, aided by the research, to sell the new policy and to make it appear inevitable and irresistible.”
“By following the evolution of this propaganda in the most prestigious scholarly journal in the world, [CFR mouthpiece] Foreign Affairs, anyone can determine years in advance what the future defense and foreign policies of the United States will be,” the respected admiral warned after ditching his membership at the CFR. “If a certain proposition is repeated often enough in that journal, then the U.S. Administration in power — be it Republican or Democratic — begins to act as if that proposition or assumption were an established fact.”
While that may not be true in the Trump era, when voters and their president have openly rejected globalism, it certainly has been true for decades, if not generations, regardless of the party formally in power. Then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton noted publicly that the CFR told her what she should be doing and how she should be thinking about the future. Former Vice President Joe Biden, meanwhile, joked that he worked for CFR boss Richard Haass. Even many top “Republicans” are involved.
Of course, the latest CFR agenda starts with a kernel of truth. As anybody with common sense can see, the economy is changing and will be undergoing further changes in the years ahead. As a result of technological developments, the future of work will look very different in 30 or 40 years than it does today. Many Americans will lose their jobs. All that is true. Of course, it would be difficult to sell enormous policy changes if the entire premise behind them was nothing but fiction, obviously.
But the agenda being pushed is another matter. Under the pretext of responding to the obvious changes coming in the years ahead, the CFR — a leading Deep State institution in America that has dominated foreign policy for generations — is pushing what critics warned was a dangerous scheme to expand the power of government. The plan also advances globalism at every level of society, a key goal of the CFR dating back to its founding. In short, it is a massive and dangerous power grab that should be resisted, critics told The New American.
Policy Proposals
(more…)
Posted in Big Government, Congress, Council of Foreign Relations, Deep State, Democrats, Demographics, Department of Education, Donald Trump, Education, Election 2020, Elitism, Entitlements, Foreign Policy, Free Trade, George W. Bush, Globalists, Globalization, Hillary Clinton, Illegal Immigration, Legal Immigration, Liberalism, Obama Administraiton and Policy, One World Government, Open Borders, Progressive Movement, Socialism, State Department, Trade Agreements | No Comments »
Wednesday, May 1st, 2019
Sidney Powell ,a former Justice Department lawyer and author of the 2016 book, “Licensed to Lie” was the guest speaker at ICON Lectures in Chapel Hill, North Carolina last night. The video of her riveting talk on the Mueller Report and Corruption in the Department of Justice will be available in about a week. In the meantime, you will find the book she wrote in 2016 on corruption in the Justice Dept a fascinating and informative read. Below are some of the editorial reviews of the book. Nancy.
Editorial Reviews
Review
”Licensed to Lie reads like a cross between investigative journalism and courtroom drama. The takeaway is that both Bushies and Obamaites should be very afraid: over the last few years, a coterie of vicious and unethical prosecutors who are unfit to practice law has been harbored within and enabled by the now ironically named Department of Justice.” –William Hodes, Professor of Law Emeritus, Indiana University, and coauthor, The Law of Lawyering
”When you have finished reading this fast-paced thriller, you will want to stand up and applaud Powell’s courage in daring to shine light into the darkest recesses of America’s justice system. The only ax Powell grinds here is Truth.” –Patricia Falvey, author of The Yellow House and The Linen Queen, and former Managing Director, PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP
”Last year four government officials demonstrably lied under oath, and nothing has been done to them–two IRS officials, the Attorney General, and James Clapper-which caused Ed Snowden to release the fact that the US is spying on its citizens and in violation of the 4th amendment. That our government is corrupt is the only conclusion. This book helps the people understand the nature of this corruption-and how it is possible for federal prosecutors to indict and convict the innocent rather than the guilty.” –Victor Sperandeo, CEO and author, Trader Vic: Methods of a Wall Street Master
”This book is a testament to the human will to struggle against overwhelming odds to right a wrong and a cautionary tale to all-that true justice doesn’t just exist as an abstraction apart from us. True justice is us, making it real through our own actions and our own vigilance against the powerful who cavalierly threaten to take it away.” –Michael Adams, PhD, University Distinguished Teaching Associate Professor of English Associate Director, James A. Michener Center for Writers, University of Texas–Austinor
”I have covered hundreds of court cases over the years and have witnessed far too often the kind of duplicity and governmental heavy-handedness Ms. Powell describes in her well-written book, Licensed to Lie.” –Hugh Aynesworth, journalist, historian, four-time Pulitzer Prize finalist, author, November 22, 1963: Witness to History
Review
Posted in Administrative State, American History, Corruption/Crime, Deep State, FBI, George W. Bush, Justice Department, Legal Issues, Liberalism, Mueller, Obama, Obama Administraiton and Policy, Political Corruption, Radical Left, Transparency, Tyranny | No Comments »
Wednesday, April 24th, 2019
Are you tired of hearing about the endless talk of President Trump and the Mueller Report ? This video interview of Andrew Breitbart from 2009 gives an inside look into the thinking of the man who pushed back fiercely against liberalism. Nancy
The Politics of Hollywood with Andrew Breitbart
Published on May 27, 2009
Identified as one of the ten most important people in the media that nobodys ever met, Andrew Breitbart details why leftward-leaning Hollywood is dangerous for America and why the people who run it are uninteresting, vitriolic, and vicious. Segueing from Hollywood to the Internet, Breitbart explores why the right dominates talk radio and the left seems to do better on the Internet and how the decline of print media is changing the nature of the national political conversation.
Posted in American Exceptionalism, American History, Andrew Breitbart, California, Conservatism, Democrats, Free Speech, George Soros, George W. Bush, Indoctrination of students, Liberalism, Obama, Radical Left, Rush Limbaugh, Social Media, Soros, Totalitarian, Videos | No Comments »
Monday, April 15th, 2019
If you are even remotely interested in seeing the grandiose photos for the proposed Obama Center (not library), there is a link at the end of the article to see the photos. It never ends with this man ! Nancy
WASHINGTON EXAMINER
Obama’s narcissism gets its monument
BY Philip Terzian March 22, 2019
EXCERPT FROM THIS ARTICLE: By contrast, at the forthcoming Barack Obama Presidential Center in Chicago, for which ground will be broken later this year, things will be quite different. To begin with, it is the Obama “center” and not the Obama “library” because it is not, in fact, a library at all: There will be no books, no presidential papers or documents, nor printed matter of any kind related to the Obama presidency, except for, presumably, what’s on sale at the gift shop.
There will be no cables, no memoranda or manuscripts, no official records of the presidency it’s designed to celebrate. The Barack Obama Presidential Center will not be a historical archive, scholarly resource, or even museum, so much as a vast, 33-acre monument to Obama, spread over multiple structures and a manicured landscape.
Most startling of all, the unclassified papers of the Obama administration, the ostensible purpose of any presidential library, will repose not in Chicago but in a distant federal warehouse, digitized for online access but otherwise inconvenient and inaccessible.
Presidential libraries are many things.
They’re repositories of the official papers and, in many cases, the personal archives and artifacts of our nation’s chief executives, as well as those of their families, friends, and colleagues in public service. And as the name would suggest, they are also home to vast collections of books, articles, dissertations, monographs, and journals about their subject or the presidency in general. They’re a scholar’s dream for historians, researchers, and students alike. If you’re seeking to understand, say, Harry S. Truman’s diplomacy or Ronald Reagan’s life before politics, a journey to Independence, Mo., or Simi Valley, Calif., is probably obligatory.
In recent decades, they’ve expanded their purview. Since the advent of Jimmy Carter’s eponymous center in Atlanta, they double as the site of think tanks, foundations, or institutes intended to continue the public work of retired or deceased presidents. Some are located at birthplaces or boyhood homes, which are of interest in themselves, or on college campuses, where their presence may evoke mixed sentiments. They are conference centers, ceremonial and mortuary sites, and, above all, tourist destinations featuring well-stocked museums, rotating exhibitions, troops of visiting schoolchildren, and capacious gift shops.
At the John F. Kennedy library alongside Boston Harbor, you can see a replica of his Oval Office, complete with rocking chair, and at the Reagan library in sunny Southern California, there’s a two-story fragment of the Berlin Wall on an outside terrace.
(more…)
Posted in Clinton, Deep State, Democrats, Election 2012, FDR, Foreign Policy, George W. Bush, Globalists, History, John F. Kennedy, Liberalism, Obama, Obama Administraiton and Policy, Progressive Movement, Radical Left, Ronald Reagan, Transparency, U.S. Presidents | No Comments »
