Archive for the ‘Medicare/Medicaid’ Category

REPUBLICAN HEALTHCARE PLAN – THE CARE ACT

Wednesday, April 2nd, 2014
On March 31, 2014,  Senator Richard Burr, Republican, North Carolina, was the guest speaker at a John Locke Foundation luncheon.  The subject of his talk was The Patient CARE Act which was sponsored by Senator Burr,  Senator Tom Coburn, Republican, Oklahoma, and Senator Orrin Hatch, Republican, Utah.   This proposal is a comprehensive alternative to Obama’s Affordable Care Act  aka Obamacare.

 

Below  you will see photos from the luncheon and  links to a detailed explanation of the Republican  plan plus a video of Senator Burr’s talk.   Many thanks to Becki Gray, Vice President for Outreach of the John Locke Foundation, for providing these links.   

Republicans do have a replacement healthcare plan!   Nancy

 

Senator Richard Burr, Republican, North Carolina

Conservative Ladies – standing from the left: Mary McKinney, Kathy Arab, Meg Gresham, Dana Postiglioni seated from the left: Laura Cox, Janie Wagstaff, Laura Gutman and Nancy Clark (Lee Green in blue dress standing in background)

Here are two links to good summaries of the Burr-Coburn plan:

 

 


 

Here is the link to Sen. Burr’s talk:  VIDEO OF SENATOR’S TALK

 

 


 

 

Share

DIGITAL MEDICINE WILL SOON SAVE YOUR LIFE

Monday, February 24th, 2014

 

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
DIGITAL MEDICINE WILL SOON SAVE YOUR LIFE
Feb. 22, 2014

EXCERPT FROM THIS ARTICLE:  The benefits of the digital revolution are large. But we’ll also have to deal with problems and unanticipated consequences, mostly related to privacy, the possibility of misuse, and the concern that patients might be overwhelmed with so much information. The government via the FDA will need to play a role to ameliorate all three of these potential issues. Regardless, digital medicine is coming over the next few years with the force of a hurricane whether we doctors—and we patients—are ready or not.

A sweeping transformation of medicine has begun that will rival in importance the introduction of anesthesia or the discovery of the germ basis of infectious disease. It will change how patients and physicians interact. It will change medical research and therapy. “Sick care”—the current model of waiting for you to get sick and then trying to alleviate symptoms and make you well—will become true “health care,” where prevention is the mantra and driving force. Welcome to the world of digital medicine.

First and foremost, the digitalization of medicine will personalize health care: Treatment will be tailored to each person as a unique individual suffering a unique illness according to his or her genetic makeup. Currently, therapy is based on population statistics. Patients are separated into groups defined in various ways but usually by similar symptoms or by the results of basic lab tests (like cholesterol levels). These groups are then treated with drugs that may help many people, but not all of them, and often only a fraction of them. By incorporating information from an individual’s DNA, the data made available through digitalization will enable clinicians to match individuals with treatments. Only patients who will benefit will get a particular drug.

This is huge. Giving drugs to patients who are not helped has been enormously expensive and often perverse. Particularly with anticancer drugs, it often condemns such patients to horrendous side effects for no benefit.

Second, digitalization will democratize medicine: You will own or control the data about your own medical condition, and you will be able to analyze it instantly by your connectivity to the Web. In many ways, the profession of medicine today is where Christianity was when the Gutenberg Bible put scriptures into the hands of the laity. But the profession is going to change, subtly and not so subtly shifting power away from the medical-industrial complex: doctors, health insurers, hospitals, medical labs and Big Pharma. (more…)

Share

AN OBAMACARE REPORT CARD

Tuesday, February 18th, 2014

 

An Obamacare Report Card

Share

THE END OF GOVERNMENT

Wednesday, February 12th, 2014

 


The end of government

By , Published: February 9, 2014

Something strange is happening in Washington. We are slowly dismantling the federal government, even as its spending is growing larger. The paradox is that governmental competence is being systematically degraded while the government’s size, as measured by its budget, is increasing. We are spending more and getting less, and — unless present trends are reversed — this will continue for years. It threatens the end of government as we know it.

The cause is no mystery. An aging population and higher health spending automatically increase budget outlays, which induce the president and Congress to curb spending on almost everything else, from defense to food stamps. Over the next decade, all the government’s projected program growth stems from Social Security and health care, including the Affordable Care Act. By 2024, everything else will represent only 7.4 percent of national income (gross domestic product), the lowest share since at least 1940, says Douglas Elmendorf, head of the Congressional Budget Office.

This is the central budget story, and it’s largely missed — or ignored — by political leaders, the media, political scientists and the public. The welfare state is taking over government. It’s strangling government’s ability to respond to other national problems and priorities, because the constituencies for welfare benefits, led by Social Security’s 57 million, are more numerous and powerful than their competitors for federal support. Politicians of both parties are loath to challenge these large, expectant and generally sympathetic groups.

The United States, of course, is not the only advanced society grappling with aging, but it is extreme in its stubborn denial of the obvious. The Pew Research Center recently polled people in 21 countries about whether aging is a problem. The United States ranked 19th in its unconcern, ahead of only Indonesia and Egypt, whose populations are young. Only 26 percent of Americans thought aging was a problem. The share was 87 percent in Japan, 55 percent in Germany and 45 percent in France. (more…)

Share

WALL STREET JOURNAL ARTICLES

Sunday, November 24th, 2013

 

The Wall Street Journal is making it more difficult  to copy  their articles so I am now just providing the links to the articles below.   Nancy
:
online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304337404579211742820387758?mod=ITP_opinion_0  – AN ALLY FRETS ABOUT AMERICAN RETREAT – An influential   Saudi royal prince talks about the U.S. debacle in Syria, the Iranian threat, and ‘this perception that America is going down.’
online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303789604579195592650374168?mod=ITP_opinion_0 – WHY IT TAKES SO LONG TO BUILD A BRIDGE IN AMERICA – There’s plenty of money.  The problem is interminable environmental review.
online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303653004579210172838389630?mod=ITP_opinion_0 – WORSE THAN OBAMACARE – Obama’s biggest failure is that he hobbled the U.S. economy   by Daniel Henninger
online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303531204579207724152219590?mod=ITP_opinion_0 – OBAMACARE FORCED MOM INTO MEDICAID – The authors’s mother preferred to pay for her own health care rather than be on the government dole.  Now she has no choice
online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303531204579204204025788642?mod=ITP_opinion_0  – THE GIPPER’S GUIDE TO NEGOTIATING  – The guy who is anxious for a deal will get his head handed to him  – by George  P. Shultz, a former secretary of labor, Treasury and state and director of the Office of Management and Budget
online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304527504579171710423780446?mod=ITP_opinion_0.  –  YOU ALSO CAN’T KEEP YOUR DOCTOR  –  The author had great cancer care and health insurance.  Her plan was canceled  and now she worries how long she’ll live. 
online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303482504579180471671106630?mod=ITP_opinion_0  –  NOBODY’S HOME AT HOMELAND SECURITY  –  The man running the inspector general’s office is under investigation;  so is the man nominated to replace him.
online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424127887324432404579051123500813210?mod=ITP_opinion_0   –  GREEN ENERGY IS THE REAL SUBSIDY HOG  –   Renewables receive three times as much money per energy unit as fossil fuels. 

 

 

Share

MEDICAID IN NORTH CAROLINA

Tuesday, October 22nd, 2013

 

CAROLINA JOURNAL

Medicaid in North Carolina

| October 3, 2013 |

Becki Gray      by Becki Gray, Carolina Journal, October 3, 2013.

Before Obamacare, before individual mandates, before exchanges, there was Medicaid. Started in 1965 under President Johnson as part of his War on Poverty, Medicaid extended health insurance coverage to low-income Americans.

Today, Medicaid is the largest publicly funded insurance program in the country. It serves low-income families, the elderly, and disabled. One In five Americans is on Medicaid, more than one-third of the births in the United States are covered by Medicaid, and one-fourth of U.S. children get health care through Medicaid.

Medicaid covers one in nine North Carolinians — 1.6 million of us — and 51 percent of births are covered by Medicaid, the sixth-highest rate in the nation.

Medicaid is funded jointly by the state and federal governments. North Carolina’s share of the program is about $3 billion, while total Medicaid spending in N.C. is closer to $14 billion.

Medicaid spending has grown 90 percent over the last decade and is the fastest-growing part of our state budget, with spending rising by 15 percent in 2011-12; 16.8 percent in
2012-13; and a projected 17.2 percent in 2014-15.

North Carolina’s Medicaid costs are the highest in the South and among the highest in the nation. We have more people enrolled and spend more per patient than neighboring states. Twenty-five percent of the state’s primary care physicians aren’t accepting new Medicaid patients, limiting access, reducing health outcomes for patients, and driving up costs.

Uncontrolled expenses result in consistent budget overruns. Just this year, legislators faced a $400 million shortfall. Since Medicaid is a federal entitlement program, it has to be funded before anything else. Medicaid is the biggest driver of state budget decisions, crowding out other priorities. (more…)

Share

LET OBAMACARE COLLAPSE

Friday, September 27th, 2013

 

The Wall Street Journal

What the GOP’s Defund-ObamaCare Caucus is failing to see is that ObamaCare is no longer just ObamaCare. It is about something that is beyond the reach of a congressional vote.

As its Oct. 1 implementation date arrives, ObamaCare is the biggest bet that American liberalism has made in 80 years on its foundational beliefs. This thing called “ObamaCare” carries on its back all the justifications, hopes and dreams of the entitlement state. The chance is at hand to let its political underpinnings collapse, perhaps permanently.

If ObamaCare fails, or seriously falters, the entitlement state will suffer a historic loss of credibility with the American people. It will finally be vulnerable to challenge and fundamental change. But no mere congressional vote can achieve that. Only the American people can kill ObamaCare.

No matter what Sen. Ted Cruz and his allies do, ObamaCare won’t die. It would return another day in some other incarnation. The Democrats would argue, rightly, that the ideas inside ObamaCare weren’t defeated. What the Democrats would lose is a vote in Congress, nothing more.

A political idea, once it becomes a national program, achieves legitimacy with the public. Over time, that legitimacy deepens. So it has been with the idea of national social insurance.

German Chancellor Otto von Bismark’s creation of a social insurance system in the 19th century spread through Europe. After the devastation of World War I, few questioned its need. In the U.S., Franklin Roosevelt’s Social Security system was seen as an antidote to the Depression. The public’s three-decade support for the idea allowed Lyndon Johnson to pass the Medicare and Medicaid entitlements even in the absence of an economic crisis.

Going back at least to the Breaux-Thomas Medicare Commission in 1999, endless learned bodies have warned that the U.S. entitlement scheme of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid is financially unsupportable. Of Medicare, Rep. Bill Thomas said at the time, “One of the biggest problems is that the government tries to administer 10,000 prices in 3,000 counties, and it gets it wrong most of the time.” But change never comes.image

Chad Crowe

The Four Horsemen of the Democratic Apocalypse. (more…)

Share

END OF LIFE RULES & REGS – BUREAUCRACY LIVES !

Monday, September 23rd, 2013

 

Bureaucracy Lives!

Share

HOW OBAMACARE HURTS CANCER PATIENTS

Wednesday, July 31st, 2013

 

The Wall Street Journal

Scott Gottlieb: How ObamaCare Hurts Patients

The 340B program was meant to help about 90 hospitals buy drugs to treat the poor. Now 1,675 hospitals qualify.

    By

  • SCOTT GOTTLIEB  Dr. Gottlieb is a physician and resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. He consults with and invests in life-science companies

EXCERPT FROM THIS ARTICLE:Under 340B, eligible hospitals are allowed to buy drugs from drug companies at forced discounts of 25% to 50%. The hospitals can then bill government and private insurers for the full cost of the drugs, pocketing the spread. The arrangement gives 340B-qualified hospitals a big incentive to search for patients and prescribe lots of drugs. The costlier the drugs, the bigger the spread. So expensive cancer drugs are especially appealing.

The original legislation creating 340B envisioned that only about 90 hospitals that care for a “disproportionate share” of indigent patients would qualify. But remember, this is a well-intentioned government program handing out money, with the usual result: By 2011, 1,675 hospitals, or a third of all hospitals in the country, were 340B-qualified.

Even flourishing hospitals like the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania and Duke University Health System feed off the subsidies. In 2011, Duke bought $54.8 million in drugs from the discount program and sold them to patients for $131.8 million, for a profit of $76.9 million—a substantial portion of the health system’s 2011 operating profit of $190 million. Only one in 20 patients served by Duke’s 340B pharmacy is uninsured. The rest have their prescription costs covered by Medicare, Medicaid or commercial insurers.

President Obama promised to mend the failings in the American health-care system, and yet for cancer treatment, ObamaCare is taking a rotten feature of the old system and making it worse.

The Affordable Care Act expands a program called 340B, which siphons money from drug makers and insurers to subsidize certain hospitals. The program has been expanded as a way to offset some of the cuts that the law imposes on hospitals. One significant side effect: 340B is increasing the cost of cancer care—and harming its quality. 

When the program began in 1992, its aim was to support hospitals that cared for many uninsured, indigent patients. Over the years, the program was radically broadened, gradually morphing into a government cash cow that hospitals of every description have learned to exploit. (more…)

Share

HOSPITALS PRESCRIBE BIG DATA TO TRACK DOCTORS AT WORK

Saturday, July 13th, 2013

 

The Wall Street Journal

Hospitals Prescribe Big Data to Track Doctors at Work

Marnie Baker, a pediatrician at California’s MemorialCare Health System, has an easy manner and ready smile. Now, though, her job is to be the bearer of a serious and, for some of her colleagues, unwelcome message.

She’s the voice of a program that digitally tracks their performance, informs them when they don’t measure up—and cajoles them to improve.

MemorialCare is part of a movement by hospitals around the U.S. to change how doctors practice by monitoring their progress toward goals, such as giving recommended mammograms. It isn’t always an easy sell. At one clinic earlier this year, physicians grilled Dr. Baker, who is director of performance improvement at a MemorialCare-affiliated physician group.

Cardiologist Venkat Warren said he worried that “some bean-counter will decide what performance is.” He wondered whether doctors would be pushed to avoid older and sicker patients who might drag down their numbers.

[image]

“If it isn’t cost-cutting, what is it?” Dr. Warren asked.

“It’s providing better value,” Dr. Baker responded.

Encounters like these are one result of the changes sweeping American health care. Technology is making it easier to monitor doctors’ work as patients’ details are compiled electronically instead of on paper charts. Software makers are selling new tools to crunch the data. Software called Crimson offered by the Advisory Board Co. ABCO -1.54%now includes information on more than a half-million doctors, up from fewer than 50,000 in 2009.

At the same time, more physicians are going to work for hospital systems, which are under pressure to hit quality goals and cut costs. Many are striking deals with insurers that pull them away from traditional “fee-for-service” reimbursement, which pays for medical procedures individually.

Insurers—which themselves increasingly track physician results—are moving toward providing a set payment for the overall care of a patient. This system means that doctors who provide costlier-than-average care could break the budget.

The federal health law is speeding these trends. Under the law, hospital payments and penalties from the federal Medicare program will be linked to their performance on quality gauges, particularly rehospitalizations, which are costly. The law also created a new Medicare initiative for “accountable care organizations,” providers that get extra rewards for efficiency and quality performance.

To succeed under the new health-care economics, hospital executives say, they must lean on doctors, who make nearly all the key decisions on what treatments, tests and drugs patients get. “The last frontier is the physicians,” says Thomas Heleotis, vice president of clinical effectiveness at Monmouth Medical Center, part of New Jersey’s seven-hospital Barnabas Health system. (more…)

Share
Search All Posts
Categories