THE ROCHE RECORD – THE IMF AND STRAUSS-KAHN

THE ROCHE RECORD
by Frank Roche
May 16, 2011

IMF AND STRAUSS-KAHN ARE NOT INDISPENSIBLE


As you may have heard, the leader of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) was arrested Sunday night in New York City on rape and sexual abuse charges stemming from a sexual romp he attempted with a maid at the Sofitel in midtown Manhattan.  Thankfully the women involved is physically OK.  The IMF head was removed from his Air France first class seat by Port Authority officials shortly before take-off.  I’ll leave the reporting of the story to professionals.

Of interest for now is the reaction of the financial media to Kahn’s arrest.  The globalists and one worlders in the media, CNBC, Wall St. Journal, the Economist, are already questioning if the institution and their programs can survive without Kahn, or the negative PR impact of the sex scandal.  They’re wondering if the Greek financial bailout will fall apart and if a potential domino effect will develop for the rest of Europe.

Really?

Realize only this, the IMF, nor the man who was at it’s helm as late as Sunday evening, Kahn, are indispensible when it comes to international finance and national debt management.

The IMF, created in the wake of World War II, was one of the first efforts at establishing an international institution that would lead to global governance and the elimination of independent countries constrained by protected boundaries.  The IMF has a 24 member-country board, with the US the largest contributor to the institutions budget.  It was established to manage the new fixed exchange rate system which was established at the 1944 Bretton Woods conference.  The IMF would be a sort of lender of last resort, lending reserves to countries that could not otherwise maintain their required fixed exchange rate values.  As we know now, this didn’t work.  The IMF, from the mid-1970’s to late 2008, had largely been relegated to the role of dealing with the financial problems of third world countries, more often then not making things worse for those countries rather than better.  They had a cookie cutter solution for all:  slash government spending, devalue your currency and then peg the currency to the US dollar or some basket of assets (typically other currencies). 

The global institution has been trying to find a foothold in the move towards global governance that has been under way for decades now.  It was the financial crisis we just came through that gave the IMF new standing, new reason to pump it’s muscles, a new reason to once again return to the desire for the institution to take a lead in a new global governing financial structure.  The financial crisis was used as an opportunity to move on global financial regulation, a global currency, a power grab from the US to the world (read more Asia, more Euro, more Latin America).

That Strauss-Kahn is in custody in New York will not actually negatively impact debt negotiations over Greek debt restructuring (you see national leaders in Europe are just using the IMF as political cover for the hard decisions required to keep the Euro experiement valid.  The countries leading the push for an IMF lead role are the same countries that fund the IMF).  That the IMF is without Strauss-Kahn will not disrupt the present activities of the IMF.  The media is making a moutain out of a mole hill to maintain the narrative related to things global rather than national.

Neither the IMF, or it’s hand-cuffed leader, are sufficiently important to warrant the commentary in the financial media today.  They’re only pumping up an agreed upon narrative.  Less USA, more world.

Anything that weakens the IMF is good for the US.  If we had sufficiently courageous elected officials in Washington, DC we would withdraw our membership in the IMF tomorrow.  We’d save billions.  The IMF is a failed institution.  Let it wither.

9:13 am edt Comments

May 6, 2011

THE EXTERNAL VALUE OF THE DOLLAR VS. DOMESTIC PURCHASING POWER

Financial market economics can be very complex involving many correlations between differing financial products, economic data, and differing national interest rate levels and economic performances.  Layer over that the complexities of the foreign exchange market and it becomes difficult for the outside observer to connect the dots between the value of the US dollar at any given moment, rising commodity prices, stagnant wages, high unemployment, and the reality of paying more for the gas in our cars and the food on our shelves.

There is a distinction that can be made between the external value of the US dollar and how much the dollars in our pocket, earned from expending our own labor, can buy at the retail purchase point.

While there is unquestionably a long-run correlation between the value of the US dollar on the foreign exchange market and our domestic inflation rate, the ultimate price impacts are dependent on the degree to which the US economy is dependent on international trade generally, and imports priced in another currency more specifically.  For the United States our international exposure, while at near historic levels (imports of goods represent nearly 13% of total US yearly output), is still relatively low.  Moreover, key strategic imports we are dependent on are priced in US dollars, most notably crude oil.

In a floating exchange rate system, as the US is part of (China is not), the exchange rate is the transmission mechanism that motivates trade patterns and balances.  Elevated and sustained
trade deficits are corrected through a weakening currency by causing a substitution effect from imported goods to domestic goods.  Elevated and sustained trade surpluses are corrected through a strengthening currency by causing a substitution effect from domestic goods to imported goods.  Of course, poor trade policy and fixed exhcange rate countries like China skew this mechanism for balancing trade to some extent.

While the US suffers a hurtful imbalance of trade, with China and Asia generally having come to dominate whole consumer goods segments, significant portions of dollars spent by US residents still go to domestic purchases.  To the extent an American consumer is negatively impacted by the external value of the dollar it relates in part to the individual consumption choices of Americans.  If you like foreign cars, lots of electronics and gadgets, imported food products and the like, then your own personal inflation index will be meaningfully dependent on the external value of the US dollar.  If, on the other hand, you are someone who always tries to buy American, who doesn’t require food products from another country, then your own personal inflation index will be meaningfully less dependent on the external value of the US dollar.

A price rise in a given good, especially when it comes to food and energy, hits the pocket directly.  Americans today are feeling the pinch.  It’s understandable there are anxieties and semantic differences being used to describe a price rise, inflation, purchasing power, the value of the dollar.  Inflated prices for some goods we need rather than want is not a welcome outcome.  It implies reduced purchasing power:  getting less now for the same dollars you spent at a time in the past.

The rise in the prices of food and energy has more to do with speculative trading/investing than real supply and demand re-balancing, or the value of the US dollar against the Mexican Peso.  We saw evidence of this yesterday and today in the sharp sell off in commodities across the board (real end user demand didn’t change in the past 48 hours).  Since late 2001 the US dollar has generally been on a weakening trend with a whole lot of volatility along the way.  This has largely been related to low domestic interest rates, though also to ever increasing trade and budget deficits.  Algorithmic trading has come to dominate foreign exchange trading and with that comes a focus on correlations and the dismissal of typical fundamental analysis creating price movements that often times appear counter-intuitive.  Until we get our own house in order, and to the extent the rest of the world remains reasonably stable, we should expect ongoing weakness.

Want to avoid imported inflation, buy American produced goods with the fewest foreign inputs.

There is a giant caveat here:  this analysis assumes domestic producers don’t automatically match import price rises seeking profit gains through price, but rather go after market share and increase profits through volume.

The purchasing power of the US dollar domestically is often times a separate discussion from the value of the US dollar externally.

Share

Leave a Reply

Search All Posts
Categories