Archive for the ‘Vietnam’ Category


Monday, June 11th, 2018






Monday, May 28th, 2018




Sunday, March 18th, 2018


Excellent !   Please share with your email lists. Nancy 

A great synopsis on the history of communism. Something all our children and grandchildren should see and understand, especially with the high percentage of millennials thinking that Bernie Sanders and Socialism is the answer.



Thursday, July 6th, 2017


A ceremony celebrating the naturalization  of our newest  United States citizens was held on Tuesday, July 4, 2017 at the North Carolina State House in Raleigh.  Thirty  of our new citizens from  many different countries  from around the world took the oath of allegiance to the United States.    People from many different nations and representatives of our military  from previous conflicts were in attendance to honor our newest citizens.  The following photos were taken  at the event.     Nancy   
JULY 4, 2017

Raleigh, North Carolina, State House

The American Flag and the POW Missing in Action flag that flies over the statehouse.

Daughters of the American Revolution preparing for the ceremony


Men representing our Civil War Soldiers

Our new citizens taking their oath of allegiance

The Girl Scouts leading in the Pledge of Allegiance

The orchestra playing beautiful patriotic music

Daughters of the American Revolution (DAR)

From the left: Barbara Guest and Joanie Liotta (sisters!)

Flags to be given out at the DAR welcoming table

From the left: Jane Hogan, District VI Director, DAR and Barbara Guest, DAR member

Our Veterans of Foreign Wars were also represented

Representatives of our Civil War Soldiers

DAR ladies – from the left Joanie Liottta and Jean Lusted, Regent, David Popler DAR

Our Vietnam Veterans were represented too

Ceremony honoring our Missing in Action from the Vietnam War 


Missing Man Honors Table History – National League of POWMIA …

The Empty Chair of the Missing Man

Nancy Clark, Conservative Women’s Forum and 2 Vietnam Veterans

Part of the MIA ceremony was to explain the meaning of each item placed on the Missing Man Table





Tuesday, April 4th, 2017

Trump, ISIS and Einstein

The president is about to get the same results

– – Wednesday, March 8, 2017

Bruce M. Lawlor, a retired U.S. Army major general, is a former member of the Homeland Security Advisory Council and chief of staff of the Department of Homeland Security. Kevin McCarty is a former naval officer and strategist who served under two presidents as a member of the National Security Council staff.


There needs to be an information component in the new ISIS strategy, one that meets head-on the issue of Islam being used to justify terrorist violence. The vast majority of Muslims are already with us in condemning hatred in the name of Islam, but there are still many who aren’t because a small percentage of 1.6 billion Muslims is still a lot of people. We need a political campaign to influence their ideas, to convince them that suicide vests and beheadings on the beach are not part of an answer to their problems.

The Pentagon can’t run such a campaign because it doesn’t know how, as it has proved time and time again. Ironically, it was George C. Marshall, one of our greatest generals, who understood that sometimes firepower is not the best option, and that solutions can be found outside of government, if one is willing to accept a different conceptual approach. That is what is needed here. The people who know most about how to change minds are not found in the federal government. They live in political campaigns, think tanks, advocacy groups, academia, and yes — Hollywood and the media. If you want to change people’s thinking, that’s where you go to find the men and women who can do it.

Julius Caesar went to Pontus (now Turkey) in 47 B.C. to make war on the king, and proclaimed “I came, I saw, I conquered.” President Trump went to Washington to make war on ISIS and met Albert Einstein.

Like Caesar, Mr. Trump wants to put a quick, decisive end to the barbaric “dirty rats” of ISIS, shorthand for the Islamic State. Unlike Caesar, he has to rely on others to devise a strategy that will kill his enemy. To do that, he’s ordered the Pentagon to come up with a new strategy.

It’s undeniably true that the United States needs a new approach to defeat ISIS. While President Obama issued press releases about drone attacks against individual ISIS leaders, the organization expanded into 31 countries and carried out or inspired terrorist attacks in Europe, the Middle East and the United States. Mr. Trump has wisely said we need to do something different. That’s where Albert Einstein comes in.




Tuesday, February 7th, 2017

Flashback: Jerry Brown, Biden and other Dems refused to accept Vietnamese refugees

Share on Facebook Follow on Facebook Add to Google+ Connect on Linked in Subscribe by Email Print This Post

by WorldTribune Staff, January 30, 2017

Some liberal Democrats are fighting back tears when discussing President Donald Trump’s travel ban on Muslims from seven nations.

But in 1975, leftist Dems went to great lengths to keep Vietnamese refugees (even orphans) out of the United States.

During his first stint as governor, Jerry Brown fought to stop Vietnamese refugees from being delivered to California. /AP


Trump issued the order, the White House said, so that a better system to vet refugees coming from those nations can be put into place.

The Democrat complaints in 1975 appeared to center on the fact that the refugees were escaping communism, an ideology, analysts say, liberals did not find that objectionable.

Leading the effort to ban the Vietnamese refugees was California’s Gov. Jerry Brown. Other prominent Democrats calling for the ban were Delaware’s Sen. Joe Biden, former presidential “peace candidate” George McGovern, and New York Congresswoman Elizabeth Holtzman.




Friday, November 20th, 2015


A heartfelt thanks to Colonel (Ret) Bernard L. Talley, a  US Air Force Pilot and a Vietnam POW for 6 1/2 years for sharing with us this extraordinarily emotional story  of James Stockdale, a fellow prisoner in the Hanoi Hilton.    This  very successful high level espionage operation  was kept top  secret all these past 42 years so that the technique could be used by future POW’s.  This operation was  just declassified this year and the movie was produced by the Smithsonian Channel.  Please be aware that there are scenes of torture in this movie that are very difficult to watch.   Nancy

Smithsonian Channel to Premiere THE SPY IN THE HANOI HILTON, 4/27

April 21
Related Links
Smithsonian Channel Premieres THE SPY IN THE HANOI HILTON TonightSmithsonian Channel Premieres THE SPY IN THE HANOI HILTON Tonight
April 27, 2015

Smithsonian Channel to Premiere THE SPY IN THE HANOI HILTON, 4/27

A new Smithsonian Channel special will reveal one of the greatest secrets of the Vietnam War. THE SPY IN THE HANOI HILTON, premiering Monday, April 27 at 8 p.m. ET/PT, uncovers the true story of POWs inside the Prison, known as the Hanoi Hilton, who created a high-level espionage operation that reached all the way to the CIA and the White House. This included sending radio transmissions to the Pentagon and President Nixon’s White House during the brutal Christmas Bombings of 1972, signaling that POWs inside the Hanoi Hilton were still alive and that the raid should continue.

The spy network was led by James Bond Stockdale, an air-wing commander who was shot down on a bombing mission into North Vietnam on Sept. 9, 1965. He was one of the two most senior-ranking U.S. Navy officers imprisoned in the Hanoi Hilton. Stockdale later rose to the rank of Vice Admiral, became one of the most highly decorated officers in the history of the Navy, and ran for Vice President. He was also awarded the Medal of Honor for his secret communication network and for bravery in the face of torture. Former CIA official Robert Wallace calls Stockdale’s spy network “one of the most significant activities in Agency history.”



Monday, May 18th, 2015


Many of us who were adults during the 1970’s vividly remember the “Killing Fields” of Cambodia.  Unfortunately, many of our children do not know about this horrific part of history.  Pleas share this article with your mature children who do not remember the “Killing Fields”.  There is evil in this world and we must do everything possible to fight it.   Nancy
Published on The Weekly Standard (

A Walk Past the Mass Graves

A survivor of the Khmer Rouge looks back.

Les Sillars     Les Sillars teaches journalism at Patrick Henry College and is writing Manickam’s story, Intended for Evil, to be published next year by Baker Books

May 18, 2015, Vol. 20, No. 34

EXCERPT FROM THIS ARTICLE:  Early in the morning of that April day, Communist troops drifted into Phnom Penh and the other major Cambodian cities like clouds of poisonous gas. It was the end of a brutal, five-year civil war between the Khmer Rouge and the U.S.-backed Khmer Republic. Giddy residents welcomed the Communists with cheers and flags. But almost immediately the Khmer Rouge began herding at gunpoint the city’s 2 million residents into the streets and from there into the countryside.

They started with the hospitals, forcing gravely ill and wounded patients out of their beds to hobble into 100-degree heat. Murder of a Gentle Land, by journalists John Barron and Anthony Paul, published two years later, relates how relatives or friends pushed the beds of patients unable to walk, holding up bottles of dripping plasma: “One man carried his son, whose legs had been amputated. The bandages on both stumps were red with blood, and the son, who appeared to be about twenty-two, was screaming, ‘You can’t leave me like this! Kill me! Please kill me!’ ” Thousands were shot or beaten to death, and many more died of dehydration or dysentery in the evacuation, with corpses dotting the sidewalks and ditches as crowds shuffled down the major boulevards.

The sign was clear, in English, and made an entirely reasonable request: “Please don’t walk through the mass grave.”

I was visiting Choeung Ek, memorial site for Cambodia’s infamous “killing fields,” last December. It was the execution grounds for the Phnom Penh prison called Tuol Sleng, where the Khmer Rouge tortured some 14,000 prisoners into ridiculous confessions of spying for the CIA or the Vietnamese. Underneath stands of chankiri trees, the path meandered beside grassy depressions and sandy hollows where thousands of bodies had been dumped after people’s heads were bashed in or their throats cut.

A little further along were the “killing trees” against which cadres had smashed the heads of infants, and a bit beyond that was a tall Buddhist stupa. Inside I came face to face with hundreds of human skulls on shelves in cases with glass on all sides. Visitors can look through the cases to the sunlit grounds, or up to see the shelves of skulls, one after another, rising to the ceiling. (more…)



Friday, May 8th, 2015




Even from a remove of 40 years, those last, tragic images from outside the U.S. embassy in Saigon remain a painful reminder of one of the less-noble chapters in American history.

The crush of desperate South Vietnamese begging to be let in. The Marines standing atop the walls, pushing back against the Vietnamese men and women trying to climb over. Finally, on the morning of April 30, the last helicopter takes off from the rooftop, just hours before a North Vietnamese tank breaks through the gates of the presidential palace.

Overseas Vietnamese, many of them former refugees, call this “Black April,” because it marked the end of their nation. It also marked America’s humiliation before the world.

In the 40 Aprils that have come and gone since, Vietnam has become shorthand for a political orthodoxy built on the idea that American military intervention overseas creates more problems than it solves. This thinking feeds an entire industry pumping out tedious lectures about “The Lessons of Vietnam.”

Still, the most obvious lesson of Vietnam is the one hardly ever acknowledged: the terrible price paid—human as well as strategic—when America loses a war.

This is not the received wisdom, which holds that wars are always unwinnable and the best thing America can do is to stay out or get out. The keepers of this flame do not take kindly to dissent, which this reporter saw firsthand as a White House speechwriter in 2007, when George W. Bush challenged this thinking head-on. As we prepared for a Veterans of Foreign Wars speech about America’s role in the advance of democracy in Asia, we both knew he would have to address Vietnam. Here’s what he ended up saying: (more…)



Friday, May 8th, 2015


Saigon’s Fall Still Echoes Today

Myths about the Vietnam War persist, weakening America’s role in the world.


A North Vietnamese tank rolls through the gate of the Presidential Palace in Saigon, on April 30, 1975.ENLARGE
A North Vietnamese tank rolls through the gate of the Presidential Palace in Saigon, on April 30, 1975. PHOTO: ASSOCIATED PRESS

ROBERT F. TURNER  Mr. Turner co-founded the Center for National Security Law at the University of Virginia School of Law and has co-taught an interdisciplinary seminar on the Vietnam War since 1990.

Four decades ago this week, in what was then Saigon, I was trying to facilitate the evacuation of orphans as North Vietnam’s armed forces approached the city. I had left the U.S. Army after two tours in Vietnam and had returned to do what I could to help as America fled a war—a fight for freedom—that it had shamefully chosen to forfeit.

As the nation marks the 40th anniversary of the fall of Saigon on April 30, we would do well to clear away the myths that still adhere to that bloody conflict and understand why America got involved, what went wrong and what the consequences were.

We went to war because by ratifying the United Nations Charter in 1945 and the Southeast Asia Treaty Organization (Seato) treaty a decade later, the U.S. pledged to oppose armed international aggression. Critics have long claimed that the State Department lied when it said the U.S. was responding to North Vietnamese aggression. That charge is baseless. After the war, Hanoi repeatedly acknowledged—including in its official history, “Victory in Vietnam”—its decision in May 1959 to open the Ho Chi Minh Trail and send vast numbers of troops, weapons and supplies to overthrow its neighbor by armed force. That was every bit as illegal as when North Korea invaded its southern neighbor in June 1950.

Virginia School of Law Center for National Security Law Co-Founder Robert Turner debunks historical myths and analyzes the war’s impact on U.S. foreign policy. Photo: Getty Images

The U.S. made mistakes, but the two most decisive factors in the outcome of the war were incompetent micromanagement by President Lyndon Johnson and Defense Secretary Robert McNamara, and Hanoi’s brilliant propaganda campaign, which fueled a gullible—and often disingenuous—global peace movement. Protesters, as angry as they were misinformed, ultimately persuaded Congress in May 1973 to prohibit spending on further U.S. combat operations in Indochina. (more…)

Search All Posts