Archive for the ‘Caliphate’ Category

CREEPING ISLAM IN SCHOOLS

Friday, February 23rd, 2018

 

Britain: The Hijab as the Entry Point for Islam

And...

West Virginia: School district ok’s mosque’s ‘indoctrination’ of teachers

Share

VIDEO – SWEDISH PARADISE LOST

Friday, February 16th, 2018

 

Caution, it is extremely difficult to view the photos of the women who have been brutalized  by the migrants.   Nancy
Subject: SWEDISH PARADISE – BEFORE MUSLIM IMIGRATION . . . .

SCROLL DOWN TO CLICK ON SITE . . .
 

 .
Subject: A Scandinavian Paradise

This is the result of not having Immigration laws that really vet those who are permitted to enter a country and enforce them.  A country should not allow anyone to enter their country illegally.  President Trump is so correct on this issue and I hope every citizen will support him.  It is most important of what you see in the video below will take place in this country. We are lucky to receive this alert and act now to prevent this from happening in our great country.
  A MUST SEE     Subject: A Scandinavian Paradise
Share

JUDGE DISALLOWS REFERENCES TO CAIR-HAMAS TIES IN LAWSUIT

Thursday, February 15th, 2018

 

CLARION PROJECT

Judge Disallows References to CAIR-Hamas Ties in Suit

In a dangerous and bizarre precedent, a federal judge disallowed references to the Council on American Islamic Relations’ (CAIR) ties to Hamas in a lawsuit brought by a civil liberty group against the San Diego Unified School District, reported the Investigative Project on Terrorism.

However, U.S. District Judge Cynthia Bashant did allow references to CAIR’s hostility towards Israel and allegations that CAIR “promotes discriminatory bias against non-Muslim students on the basis of their religion.”

The case involves a suit brought by the Freedom of Conscience Defense Fund (FCDF) against the school district for instituting an anti-Islamophobia/anti-bullying program designed by CAIR.

The suit charges that the program is unconstitutional because it violates the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause, which prohibits government actions that unduly favor one religion over another.

Since the program is solely about Muslims students, the FCDF charges that it establishes them “as a privileged group within the school community.” Moreover, the suit contends that CAIR, the designers of the program, is an organization that is “intrinsically religious in nature.”  In addition, the suit charges that CAIR has “prioritized public schools as ground zero to advance its religious mission.”

(more…)

Share

VIDEO – MUSLIM CHILDREN – TELL WHAT THEY WILL DO TO CHRISTIANS AND JEWS

Thursday, February 8th, 2018

 

 

Does this look like a “religion of peace” to you ?  Nancy

VIDEO AND ARTICLE

Watch: Muslims Children go on live TV, openly tell what they will do to Jews and Christians

Share

GUANTANAMO BAY – JUSTICE DELAYED

Tuesday, January 23rd, 2018

 

These terrorists  are captured enemy combatants and should be dressed in orange jump suits, not the flamboyant Muslim head dresses and costumes that they wear to make a mockery of their trial.  Our justice system at Guantanamo should be just and swift and not the circus that is exposed in this article.  Camp Justice, indeed !!!  Nancy

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

Justice Delayed at Guantanamo Bay

Paralyzed by endless litigation over procedure, the 9/11 war-crimes commission grinds on.

Guantanamo Bay’s Camp Justice, where the military commission meets.
Guantanamo Bay’s Camp Justice, where the military commission meets. PHOTO:MANDEL NGAN/AFP/GETTY IMAGES

Guantanamo Bay, Cuba

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, mastermind of 9/11, arrives in court dressed in a headdress, tunic and short white trousers (strict fundamentalist style, purportedly emulating Muhammad). His overgrown beard is dyed orange. He sits smugly, legs dangling, and talks with his attorneys while prosecutors play video footage of the Twin Tower attacks in the ultrasecure courtroom.

Walid bin Attash, who helped select and train hijackers, and Ramzi bin al Shibh, a member of al Qaeda’s Hamburg cell, wear camouflage jackets and headdresses, as if they were still in the Afghan mountains. But the camo is hunting gear from Sears—the Guantanamo Military Commission won’t let them wear anything realistic enough to be confused with the guards’ uniforms.

Ammar al Baluchi, KSM’s nephew and a courier for Osama bin Laden, dresses like a prince in a fictional epic: maroon, fez-like headcap, fancy, dark velvet vest. A richly embroidered prayer rug is slung over the back of his chair.

Mustafa al Hawsawi, a money man, looks like a martyr dressed for the grave, in white linen and a shawl embroidered with Palestinian flags. One way or another, all five are projecting versions of the fantasies common to radical Islamists.

This weeklong December hearing, which I attended as an observer, marked the U.S. government’s first formal presentation of evidence against the five living men most culpable for 9/11. It came during the fifth year of pretrial motions. The trial, now projected to take place in 2019, will no doubt be followed by many appeals. By the time it’s over, justice will have been delayed by decades.

In the courtroom, it wasn’t hard to see why. Start with the rules, which Congress, the Supreme Court and two administrations each had a hand in shaping. The Guantanamo trial procedures are, with a few exceptions, supposed to be as close as possible to those in courts-martial. As a result, every procedural niggle is litigated from the ground up, with no controlling precedents. The rules aim to keep the trial moving by allowing hearsay evidence, and to avoid the controversy over “torture” by excluding evidence obtained via contested interrogation methods. But in the constant litigation over procedure, defense attorneys can fight the former and keep the latter front and center.

  And whereas the decisions of other war-crimes tribunals have been final or nearly so, three Washington-based courts—the Court of Military Commission Review, the Circuit Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court—will all hear appeals from Gitmo. With a trial this complex, that structure guarantees extensive litigation after the trial and overcaution now.

Intelligence bureaucracy protocols have complicated the administration of justice. After a defense lawyer allegedly mishandled a piece of classified evidence, a JAG major stammered to the court that it would take a year to resolve the matter through the bureaucracy, during which the trial would stop. The flabbergasted judge compelled an agency head to appear in court and speed things up.

The week I visited, a veteran prosecutor made a hash of an important motion. Mr. al Hawsawi’s attorneys argued that under the law of war, there wasn’t enough sustained fighting between the U.S. and al Qaeda to meet the definition of “hostilities,” before or even on 9/11, and therefore the court has no authority to try the defendants. Supporting this premise was a defense expert witness, a professor of international law.

The government hadn’t called its own international-law expert, and when the prosecutor rose to cross-examine this witness, he ran into a buzzsaw of objections, which the judge cuts short after 12 minutes with a mercy lunch break. In the afternoon, the judge had to intervene to ask the key questions: Wasn’t this court designed to try the 9/11 cases?

This was the worst misstep in a week with too many of them. Nonetheless, the government has a strong case. Prosecutors have presented proof that Mr. al Hawsawi moved money for nine of the 17 hijackers and showed video of him congratulating Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan after the attacks. But being right isn’t always enough to win a trial. And for the defense attorneys these trials are the greatest challenges of their careers.

JAG or civilian, most of these lawyers are able, principled death-penalty opponents. But some show signs of troubling moral inversion. One told me with a straight face that, given all her client has suffered, he should be let out with time served. All the civilian female defense attorneys wore Islamic headdresses when their clients were present—not at the request of their clients, nor for religious reasons, but sua sponte, to build trust. Maybe it works—but it also seems to aid the defendants’ efforts at costumed theatrics. Meanwhile, two of KSM’s attorneys have recently converted to Islam and pray with the defendants in the courtroom during breaks in the trial.

 Just as justice demands these men be executed if guilty, it also demands they have a chance to answer the charges against them. It is a domestic and foreign-policy imperative that the U.S. be seen to give a fair trial, and lay its evidence before the world. But this process looks like something else altogether—paralysis.

Defense Secretary Jim Mattis visited Gitmo around Christmas, and the Trump administration is reportedly reviewing its approach to the trials. If so, good. Few topics are more in need of top-to-bottom re-evaluation.

Mr. Gallagher is a second-year student at New York University Law School. He was observing the trial on behalf of Judicial Watch and the NYU Federalist Society.

Share

VIDEO – JOHN GUANDOLO – NEW TV SERIES TO EXPLAIN THE THREAT

Tuesday, January 16th, 2018

 

UTT Launches New TV Show
Understanding the Threat TV launched the first episode of a new weekly 30 minute online TV show on WVWTV.com.

The show is free for viewers at this online site.

The first episode can be viewed online HERE.

The purpose of the show is to discuss the threat of the Islamic Movement in the United States and to walk viewers through HOW the Muslim Brotherhood gained so much control inside the U.S. and its society.

The series includes 12 episodes.

Please watch and share this with others.

UTT would like to thank WorldviewWeekend.com for their support of UTT’s radio and TV programs.  The mission is to spread the word about the threats American faces through all mediums possible.

The 30 minute UTT Radio Show airs each Monday and remains online at www.WorldviewRadio.com [click link to John Guandolo] for one week before a new episode is uploaded.

Join UTT as we take the fight to the enemy and put freedom on the offensive where it belongs.

Share

VIDEO – SERMON IN A RALEIGH MOSQUE

Tuesday, January 9th, 2018

 

Thanks to Laura Gutman for sharing this video  with us.  This is an inside look at the  “Religion of Peace” .    Nancy

A little reminder for those clueless ones who are all in for interfaith togetherness, dialogue, etc etc etc.  This is what goes on when they think we aren’t watching.    LG
memri
January 8, 2018

 No.

7271

Sermon In Raleigh, North Carolina-Area Mosque: ‘Al-Quds [Jerusalem]… Jaffa, Acre, And Haifa… It Is Our Land… And Will Return To Us’; ‘We Will Fight Those Jews Until The Rocks And The Trees’ Say ‘Oh Muslim, This Is A Jew Behind Me’; ‘Those Occupiers Made Some Legends’ About The ‘Wall Of Buraq’ And ‘Made It Their Own Wall’ And ‘Distorted The Facts’

In a Friday, December 8, 2017 antisemitic sermon delivered in a mosque in the Raleigh, NC area, Imam Abdullah Khadra stressed: “Al-Quds [Jerusalem]… Jaffa, Acre, and Haifa… will remain our land, and will return to us sooner or later.” Referring to the well-known Hadith stating that on Judgment Day the Muslims will kill the Jews, he said: “The Prophet Muhammad gave us the glad tidings that… we will fight those Jews until the rocks and the trees will speak: Oh Muslim, this is a Jew behind me.” He added that “these occupiers, aggressors, and murderers” had made “some legends” about “the Wall of Buraq,” and had “made it their own wall’ and “distorted the facts,” noting, “May Allah destroy everyone who wants evil for Islam and Muslims.”

The Syria-born Khadra, who was cleared for entry to the U.S. on a religious work visa and came to Raleigh, NC in 2011,[1] and later applied for political asylum,[2] is principal of Cary Masjid’s IQRA Academy educational program,[3]and teaches at Islamic centers, including, in the past, at the Islamic Association of Raleigh.[4] He is an active preacher in several mosques in the Raleigh area. His YouTube channel, which posts videos of himself speaking on religious topics, has over 2,000 subscribers,[5] and on his Facebook page he posts similar videos, along with some pro-Palestinian content and, in December 2017, some Christmas greetings. [6] He was in the news in early 2017 when his four-year-old daughter was not allowed to reenter the U.S. after a visit with relatives in Lebanon in October 2016 due to a visa issue; she was reunited with her family in February 2017.[7] In April 2017 interview about the U.S. airstrikes against the Assad regime in Syria, he expressed satisfaction at the strikes, and added that without the removal of the regime, the massacres of the people there will continue, and much more needs to be done to stop the regime.[8]

The following are Imam Khadra’s statements in his December 8, 2017 sermon. The video did not identify the mosque where this sermon was delivered.

VIDEO
Share

VIDEO AND ARTICLE – MIGRANTS ARE BASICALLY INCOMPATIBLE WITH EUROPEAN CULTURE

Sunday, January 7th, 2018

 

VIDEO  MIGRANTS ARE BASICALLY INCOMPATIBLE WITH EUROPEAN CULTURE

gatesofvienna.net/2018/01/milos-zeman-the-culture-of-these-migrants-is-basically-incompatible-with-european-culture/#more-44855

Posted on January 5, 2018 by Baron Bodissey

REASONS WHY THEY ARE INCOMPATIBLE

ARTICLE   GATES OF VIENNA  – IN THEIR OWN WORDS

gatesofvienna.net/2018/01/in-their-own-words/

In Their Own Words

In an appropriate follow-up to his essay posted yesterday, Michael Copeland sends this list of apposite quotes from well-known Islamic leaders (and the Koran).

 

 

Instructing Murder: Islamic Leaders Speak

Collected by Michael Copeland

“Those who know nothing of Islam pretend that Islam counsels against war. Those are witless. Islam says: kill all of the unbelievers as they would kill you all.”
Ayatollah Khomeini, Logans Warning.
“Killing is a great Divine gift.”
Ayatollah Khomeini, Winds Of Jihad, 21 January 2012.
PLEASE CLICK ON THE LINK TO READ THE ENTIRE  ARTICLE OF QUOTES FROM ISLAMIC LEADERS
Share

CLINTON AND HUMA ABEDIN REMOVED FILES FROM STATE DEPARTMENT

Sunday, December 17th, 2017

 

 

Obama State Department Let Clinton And Huma Make Off With Boxes Of ‘Muslim Engagement’ Docs

by  Jack Crowe  Political Reporter   December 14, 2017

The Obama State Department allowed former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her top aide Huma Abedin to remove call logs, scheduling documents and files described as “Muslim Engagement” from government premises by labeling the records “private,” Judicial Watch has learned.

Judicial Watch obtained records about the document removals in response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for all forms authorizing the removal of “personal papers and non-record materials,” according to a Thursday press release.

“These new documents show the Obama State Department had a deal with Hillary Clinton to hide her calls logs and schedules, which would be contrary to FOIA and other laws,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said in a statement. “When are the American people going to get an honest investigation of the Clinton crimes?”

The documents, which are not classified but carry a special notation that they are not to be made public under normal FOIA procedure, include a list of Clinton’s personal and official calls. The special notation was included as part of an addendum signed by Clarence N. Finney Jr., then-director of the Office of Correspondence and Records, who reviewed the records.

The newly obtained records also show that Abedin was authorized to remove five boxes of “physical files” that include documents described as “Muslim Engagement.”

They also indicate that Clinton removed a physical file of “the log of the Secretary’s gifts with pictures of gifts,” which could potentially expose Clinton Foundation and Clinton Global Initiative connections.

Follow Jack on Twitter

Share

MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD WAGING WAR – THEN AND NOW

Friday, December 8th, 2017

 

December 6, 2017

Muslim Brotherhood Waging War – Then & Now

by John Guandolo

The Muslim American Society (MAS) is identified by the U.S. government as “founded as the overt arm of the Muslim Brotherhood in America.” (US v Sabri Benkahla, 4th Circuit Court of Appeals, No 07-4778)

The Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA) is identified in the Muslim Brotherhood’s strategic plan as a part of their Movement in North America, and the ICNA handbook demonstrates their objectives are the same as those of the Islamic State and Al Qaeda.

The stated objective of the Muslim Brotherhood is to wage war against non-muslims to establish an Islamic State under sharia (Islamic Law).

In 2000, ICNA and MAS formally joined forces and partnered with each other.  The created a joint syllabus and a Tarbiya (training) Guide for Islamic workers and volunteers for ICNA-MAS in the United States.

Here are some quotes from the ICNA Tarbiya Guide:

“‘And fight them until persecution is no more and Deen is all for Allah.’ (Al Quran 8:39).  This means that you wage war so that the evil sovereignty of beings, other than that of Allah is wiped out.” (p 117)

“…un-Islamic governments must sincerely hated and despised for the pleasure of God…” (p 144)

“This witness of ours would not be complete unless we establish a state based on the principles and teachings of Islam.” (p 182)

“The adoption and adaptation of capitalist, socialist, communist or other manmade systems, either in whole or in part, constitutes a denial of Islam and disbelief in Allah Lord of the Worlds.” (p 192)

(more…)

Share
Search All Posts
Categories