Archive for the ‘Abortion’ Category

VIDEO LIZ WHEELER DESTROYS ELIZABETH WARREN AND PLANNED PARENTHOOD WITH FACTS !

Tuesday, July 18th, 2017

 

  Liz Wheeler destroys Elizabeth Warren with FACTS !    Thanks to Bill Mehann for sharing this video.    Nancy
VIDEO  – LIZ WHEELER DESTROYS ELIZABETH WARREN AND PLANNED PARENTHOOD
June 24, 2017   One America News Network 
Share

JESUS WOULD HOLD WOMEN’S HANDS DURING ABORTION: ABORTIONIST

Tuesday, June 6th, 2017

 

Jesus would hold women’s hands to support them during abortion: abortionist

Amy Hagstrom Miller says she is ‘mission-driven’ by her commitment ‘to human rights and justice.’Rachel Madow Show screensho

FORT WORTH, Texas, March 4, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) — The abortionist who appealed to the Supreme Court in oral arguments this week says Jesus would supportively hold the hands of women as they abort their children.

Amy Hagstrom Miller, whose Texas abortion business conglomerate Whole Women’s Health owns and runs seven abortion facilities, says she is “mission-driven” by her commitment “to human rights and justice.”

She is fighting state legislation requiring her abortionists to have a local hospital admitting agreement, and requiring her abortion mills to have cleanliness and facility standards up to the required standards of other surgical clinics.

Legislators say the laws protect the health and safety of women. Miller says the laws were only passed to create fear and discourage women from choosing abortion.

In an interview with the pro-abortion website alternet.org, Miller explains that she reassures hesitating Christian mothers and encourages them to abort by telling them, “The majority of our patients are Christian. The majority are mothers already.”

“I was raised in a liberal Christian tradition, and I come to the work (at one of her seven abortion businesses) because of that background,” she shared.  “The Jesus that I was taught about would be holding the hands of women inside the clinic.”

One of the pro-life laws passed in Texas is an informed consent law, which gives women the choice to look at an ultrasound of her growing baby, which must be done anyway to determine the baby’s gestational age.  Proponents of the pro-life law say seeing an ultrasound has encouraged many women to keep their baby and choose life.  

(more…)

Share

CALIFORNIA’S ABORTION INDUSTRY

Thursday, March 30th, 2017

 

CALIFORNIA’S MORAL ATROCITY
The state’s attorney general is going after, not people who confessed on camera to murders, but the investigative reporters who uncovered the crimes.
 In a parade of horrors exposed by the Center for Medical Progress, one episode stands out.
 In the seventh video released by undercover journalists David Daleiden and Sandra Merritt, former
StemExpress technician Holly O’Donnell describes an experience at Planned Parenthood Mar Monte’s Alameda Clinic in San Jose, Calif.:
 “I want you to see something kinda cool. This is kinda neat,” [says O’Donnell’s coworker]. So I’m over here, and . . . the moment I see it, I’m just flabbergasted. This is the most gestated fetus and the closest thing to a baby I’ve seen. And she is, like, “Okay, I want to show you something.” So she has one of her instruments, and she just taps the heart, and it starts beating. And I’m sitting here, and I’m looking at this fetus, and its heart is beating, and I don’t know what to think. O’Donnell is then told to “harvest” the child’s brain: “[She] gave me the scissors and told me that I had to cut down the middle of the face.” O’Donnell did as asked.
 
It’s not often that someone confesses to murder on camera, but that is what O’Donnell did, assuming her account was accurate. The California Penal Code defines murder as the “unlawful killing of a human being, or a fetus, with malice aforethought.” Not only did Planned Parenthood refuse to render care to a born-alive infant, as required by California law; it acted affirmatively to cause the child’s death.

Read more at: www.nationalreview.com/article/446250/californias-moral-atrocity-felony-charges-reporters-who-uncovered-abortion-atrocities


VIDEO

www.centerformedicalprogress.org/2017/03/planned-parenthood-abortionist-pay-attention-to-whos-in-the-room-to-deal-with-infants-born-alive/  

Planned Parenthood Abortionist: “Pay Attention To Who’s In The Room” To Deal With Infants Born Alive

Share

PLANNED PARENTHOOD DONATED TO AG WHO CHARGED ACTIVISTS

Thursday, March 30th, 2017

 

THE DAILY WIRE

AG Who Charged Activists For Exposing Planned Parenthood Received Thousands In Donations From Planned Parenthood

By James Barrett      March 29, 2017
California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, who recently charged two pro-life activists on 15 felony counts for their work exposing Planned Parenthood’s sale of aborted baby body parts, received thousands in donations from the abortion provider, according to the numbers provided by Open Secrets.

 On Tuesday, Becerra charged David Daleiden and Sandra Merritt of the Center for Medical Progress on 15 felony counts for the role they played in an undercover investigation of Planned Parenthood’s “fetal tissue” trade practices. In 2015, CMP began to release videos of the footage they obtained in their undercover operation, some of which featured Planned Parenthood officials and former employees discussing the taxpayer-funded organization’s disturbing and potentially illegal practices regarding the selling of the body parts of aborted babies. Though the state of Texas pursued charges against the activists, the charges were eventually dismissed.

Now, Becerra has raised the stakes, throwing 15 felony counts at the pro-life journalists, claiming they violated California law by recording “private” conversations without the consent of both parties (more on that below).  But as it turns out, Becerra has a conflict of interest. Over the years, he has received a total of $5,535 dollars in campaign contributions from the organization at the center of the case.

Life News provides the breakdown: “$1,000 in 2014$2,000 in 2012$500 in 2004$1,000 in 2002, and $1,035 in 1998.”

 

(more…)

Share

VIDEO – LIZ WHEELER – A DAY WITHOUT WOMEN

Wednesday, March 15th, 2017

Liz Wheeler Stumps All Over “The Day Without A Woman” And She’s RIGHT!!!!!

Share

VIDEO – GEORGE SOROS – THE IDEOLOGY BEHIND THE MAN

Thursday, November 17th, 2016

Share

PRIEST URGE PRO-LIFE VOTERS TO TURN OUT ON ELECTION DAY

Monday, November 7th, 2016

 

Priests Urge Pro-Life Voters To Turn Out On Election Day


Catholic priest Hills tells congregation if you vote for Clinton you’re not able to get communionVIDEO

www.oann.com/priests-urge-pro-life-voters-turn-election-day/

 

Share

HILLARY, THE SUPREME COURT AND THE CONSTITUTION

Friday, October 21st, 2016

 

For all you undecided voters out there, this is the number one reason to vote for Donald Trump !   Nancy 
THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

Hillary’s New Constitution

Clinton explains how she’ll gut the First and Second Amendments.

October 21, 2016

Donald Trump is no legal scholar, but at Wednesday’s presidential debate he showed a superior grasp of the U.S. Constitution than didHillary Clinton. Amid the overwrought liberal fainting about Mr. Trump’s bluster over accepting the election result (see below), Mrs. Clinton revealed a view of the Supreme Court that is far more threatening to American liberty.

Start with her answer to moderator Chris Wallace’s question about the role of the courts. “The Supreme Court should represent all of us. That’s how I see the Court,” she said. “And the kind of people that I would be looking to nominate to the court would be in the great tradition of standing up to the powerful, standing up on our behalf of our rights as Americans.”

Where to begin with that one? The Supreme Court doesn’t—or shouldn’t—“represent” anyone. In the U.S. system that’s the job of the elected branches. The courts are appointed, not elected, so they can be nonpartisan adjudicators of competing legal claims.

Mrs. Clinton is suggesting that the Court should be a super-legislature that vindicates the will of what she calls “the American people,” which apparently excludes “the powerful.” But last we checked, the Constitution protects everyone, even the powerful. The law is supposed to protect individual rights, not an abstraction called “the people.”

The Democrat went downhill from there, promising to appoint judges who would essentially rewrite the First and Second Amendments. Asked about the 2008 Heller decision that upheld an individual right to bear arms, Mrs. Clinton claimed to support “reasonable regulation.” She said she criticized  Heller because it overturned a District of Columbia law intended merely “to protect toddlers from guns and so they wanted people with guns to safely store them.”

Toddlers had nothing to do with it. What Mrs. Clinton calls “reasonable” was an outright ban on handguns. The D.C. law allowed the city’s police chief to award some temporary licenses—but not even the police officer plaintiff in the case could persuade the District to let him register a handgun to be kept at his home.

Anyone who did lawfully possess a gun had to keep it unloaded and either disassembled or bound by a trigger lock at all times, ensuring it would be inoperable and perhaps useless for self-defense. AsAntonin Scalia wrote for the Heller majority, “Few laws in the history of our Nation have come close to the severe restriction of the District’s handgun ban.”

(more…)

Share

THE ISSUES AND WHERE THE REPUBLICAN AND DEMOCRAT PARTY PLATFORMS STAND

Tuesday, October 18th, 2016

 

billygraham.org/story/2016-party-platforms/comment-page-101/#comment-1495357

Democratic and Republican Party Platforms: Where They Stand on the Issues

By    •   August 23, 2016


Sanctity of human life


Democratic

Democrats seek to repeal the 1976 Hyde Amendment so that federal funds can be used to pay for abortions. The platform says, “We will continue to stand up to Republican efforts to defund Planned Parenthood health centers.” Democrats support ratification of UN efforts that affirm “the reproductive rights of women” globally.

Republican
The GOP asserts the sanctity of human life and affirms, “The unborn child has a fundamental right to life which cannot be infringed.” The party supports a Human Life Amendment making clear that the 14th Amendment’s protections apply to children before birth, and it salutes states that require informed consent, parental consent, waiting periods and clinic regulation.

Marriage


Democratic

Democrats applaud last year’s Supreme Court ruling that “LGBT people—like other Americans—have the right to marry the person they love.”

Republican
The GOP platform condemns the Supreme Court’s rulings that removed the ability of Congress and the people to define marriage as the union of one man and one woman. The GOP urges the reversal of those decisions, whether through judicial reconsideration or a constitutional amendment.

Religious freedom


Democratic

The Democratic platform says: “We support a progressive vision of religious freedom that respects pluralism and rejects the misuse of religion to discriminate.” The party opposes a religious test to bar immigrants or refugees from entering the country.

Republican
Republicans affirm that religious freedom in the Bill of Rights protects the right of the people to practice their faith in their everyday lives. The platform endorses the First Amendment Defense Act, which would protect faith-based institutions and individuals from government discrimination.

(more…)

Share

VIDEO -HILLARY CLINTON ON ABORTION

Friday, October 14th, 2016

Share
Search All Posts
Categories